Hi Nicholas,
On 21/11/2021 22:13, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Yes, I can create the first two at what will probably be round two of
> the reviews, but I recommend waiting for syncthing-tray, because you may
> prefer a "gbp" style repository for it, for ease of unbundling using
> Files-Excluded. S
Hi Nicholas,
On 01/12/2021 18:09, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Once again, if you find these changes boring/not worth your time, then I
> can take care of them (unless you're working towards Debian Maintainer,
> uploading status, where it will better support your application to have
> done this you
Hi Nicholas,
On 21/11/2021 22:12, Nicholas D Steeves wrote
> I've fixed all of these issues on my local branch, so if you find
> this stuff boring I can take care of it. If you're considering
> pursuing Debian Maintainer (uploading) status it's important to learn
> why these are significant.
I d
Hi Nicholas,
For the "debian" group, no additional obligations, and no interference
from evolving team policies which you may or may not appreciate. The
undocumented (as far as I know) conventions of this group are as
follows:
1. All DDs have commit access (as a rule rather than convention)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hannah Rittich
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, v...@rittich.net
* Package name: martchus-cpp-utilities
Version : 5.11.1
Upstream Author : Martchus
* URL : https://github.com/Martchus/cpp-utilities
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hannah Rittich
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, v...@rittich.net
* Package name: martchus-qtutilities
Version : 6.5.0
Upstream Author : Martchus
* URL : https://github.com/Martchus/qtutilities
* License
Hi,
I have created a patch set which allows to specify a prefix for the
files and directories that are installed into system directories. These
patches have also been accepted by the upstream author. Thus, the
packages cpputilities and qtutilities can be installed using a more
specific naming.
I
Hi Nicholas,
hi Alexandre,
Am 27.09.21 um 03:27 schrieb Nicholas D Steeves:
> By the way, is this your first Debian contribution? If so, welcome! :-)
It is, indeed, besides some bug reports. Thank you.
> So option #1 is patching the library, and not using a different package
> name at the dpkg
Hey Nicholas,
nice to hear that you are still interested.
I have read this BTS entry, as well as the related GitHub issue [1].
Indeed, libc++utilities and libqtutilities are quite generic names. I
think, there are three ways to deal with this.
1. Rename the libraries. Build a package for each o
Hey Nicholas,
I wanted to ask whether you are still working on packaging
syncthingtray. If not, I would offer to do the packaging.
Regards,
Hannah
10 matches
Mail list logo
