Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Just for the record, apt-offline is being tailored for inclusion into Debian at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/rrs-guest/apt-offline.git;a=summary
Hello,
I find interesting your program.
I'm one of the maintainers of apt-zip, which do similar tasks, but:
- it is not
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anibal Monsalve Salazar
* Package name: libposix
I still have doubts that this package is undistributable with this name,
because of POSIX trademark (but DFSG allow us to change the package name).
Note: It is not the
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
Hello Burkhard
since I'm maintaining these packages anyway, it wouldn't mind doing
that within the official distribution.
However, I'm not a DD, so I need someone to sponsor me, right?
Are you proposing to do so? And if so, what is the first step to get me
startet?
I'm s
William Pitcock wrote:
- epic4 (impossible to get an exception, dead contributors)
You are wrong to the "impossible to get an exception, dead
contributors", in this sentence and in other sentences:
The copyright go to the heirs, so you could contact the
heirs.
Anyway, we should follow the c
What is the status of this bug?
I see that you changes few time the bug title,
so now is it really RFP?
Do you have a preliminary version?
If I don't see a reply in next few days, I'll
pack a new version.
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Baruch Even wrote:
Hi,
There is no free license for BitKeeper. So it is not possible to have
this package in Debian anymore, not even in non-free.
Perhaps you should close the ITP?
Baruch
Ok.
Forgot about it.
I'll close it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
6 matches
Mail list logo
