On 1/24/17, 2:03 PM, "carandr...@gmail.com on behalf of Carnë Draug"
wrote:
>>...
>> Yes, I know. I simply have forwarded the issue upstream since the RFP
>> came from upstream and I considered it more sensible if they provide
>> some means to exclude http access directly in their code.
>>
>>
med/libbio-eutilities-perl.git]
Hi Christopher,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 07:25:38PM +0000, Fields, Christopher J wrote:
> Just ran tests on a non-networked laptop (both latest from Github and the
1.75 release from CPAN) and they were fine, all passed and the relevant network
test
Andreas,
Just ran tests on a non-networked laptop (both latest from Github and the 1.75
release from CPAN) and they were fine, all passed and the relevant network
tests are skipped. Can you be more specific as to the build failure?
chris
On 1/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Fields, Christopher J&qu
what the problem is.
chris
On 1/23/17, 9:12 AM, "Fields, Christopher J" wrote:
My suggestion is to take the avenue of easiest solution first, then most
stable solution long-term if needed.
The easiest may be to move the network tests to ‘xt’, which as Carnė
mentioned wo
My suggestion is to take the avenue of easiest solution first, then most stable
solution long-term if needed.
The easiest may be to move the network tests to ‘xt’, which as Carnė mentioned
would be run upon release only. This should be easy enough w/ a Dist::Zilla
release. Longer term a moc
5 matches
Mail list logo
