Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
For more information see RFA (open for about two years):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926966
Yours
David
--
⚑ libertⒶd ⚑
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
For more information see RFA (open for about two years):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926965
Yours
David
--
⚑ libertⒶd ⚑
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Yue Lan,
since you are already in touch with James, could you ask him, if he is
willing to sponsor the package?
I have not much time right now and never worked with dh-vim-addon before.
He can also give you access to [0] repo.
Yours
David
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/vim-team/vim-lastp
Hello Yue Lan,
On 4/16/19 5:57 AM, Yue Lan wrote:
>
> I'm interested in taking over this package. I've been doing my daily
> work with Debian and Ubuntu for over a year but haven't made a
> contribution to the community yet, and now I want to make some changes
> to my work.
That's great!
> I'v
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the vim-lastplace package.
The package description is:
Intelligently reopen files at your last edit position. By default git, svn,
and mercurial commit messages are ignored because you probably want to type a
new message and not re-edit the
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the jugglinglab package.
It's a Java application for visualization of juggling patterns.
It is near to no work, because it is not developed actively anymore. No one has
filed a bug against that package so far.
The package description is:
Hi again,
On 19.02.2017 22:40, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>>> The Depends and Build-Depends lines look surprisingly long.[...]
>> I copied both Build-Depends and Depends from the upstream control file.
>> I'm not too familiar with ${misc:Depends} and ${shlibs:Depends} . Maybe
>> you would like to fix th
Hi Rolf,
On 19.02.2017 22:40, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Part of the work as maintainer and especially when doing an ITP is to
> verify the code is indeed DFSG-free. Personally, I'd have trouble with
> ambiguity in the form of "Well, I can't really be certain if the
> software is licensed as GPL, LGP
On 20.02.2017 22:29, David Rabel wrote:
> On 19.02.2017 22:40, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> This is usually only necessary if
>> those autogenerated files are old and do not support newer platforms.
>> That's when you need to autoreconf. Otherwise, it's unnecessary but
Hi there,
On 19.02.2017 22:40, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> On 19.02.2017 19:45, David Rabel wrote:
>> I think you are wrong here. intltoolize is not run by autoreconf.
>
> That's what I read during my research about dh-autoreconf (not
> autoreconf). It's entirely possib
Me again. ;)
dpkg-source emits a warning concerning the fiels that dh-clean deletes,
e.g.:
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file missing, use
--include-removal to override
Is this a problem?
David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
his
> picked up automatically by ${misc:Depends} and ${shlibs:Depends}? If
> necessary this can be fixed later, but it struck me as odd when I
> stumbled upon it now.
I copied both Build-Depends and Depends from the upstream control file.
I'm not too familiar with ${misc:Depends}
On 18.02.2017 20:59, David Rabel wrote:
>> 329aa8ce287
>> "Other" is not a good name for License. I suggest to follow
>> https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/g/granule/copyright-1.4.0-7-4
>> or https://github.com/giuliopaci/SPro/blob/master/debian/copyri
Hi Osmi,
Rolf is probably right, that you are actually the only copyright holder.
What do you think? Would it be OK for you to change the copyright for
the code to your name and mention the whole Linux community and / or
team audio recorder in the AUTHORS file instead?
Yours
David
signature
Hi Rolf,
a general question: Are you OK with the way I commit every step in git
or would you prefer that I clean up the history a little bit before pushing?
On 18.02.2017 20:14, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> 60fd5fd4c
> It's a trivial fix, but if upstream has that spelling error I think it
> would be be
Hi there,
I uploaded a new audio-recorder package to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/audio-recorder
Mainly it is an update of the debian/copyright file. But while I edited
it, I found a lot of auto-generated files in the source tarball. So I
deleted them via dquilt patch. I hope this
Bom dia,
On 11.02.2017 12:08, Osmo Antero wrote:
> I had to fix some labels and GUI issues in the Additional Settings dialog.
> The Additional Settings -> Recording commands tab had a wrong label for the
> Gstreamer pipeline command.
> It was "Package:".
> I changed it to "Command:".
>
> Would yo
Hi Rolf,
On 13.02.2017 22:43, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> great to see audiorecorder close to being included in Debian. I had
> offered help for packaging the software at
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1391951 but I never got around to doing
> an ITP. Let me know if you are interested in a co-main
Hi Arturo,
there was a new upstream version of audio-recorder today. So i packaged
the new version with my latest changes. Maybe you could upload it as
soon as version 1.9.4 is out of the NEW queue.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/audio-recorder
Btw: The mentors page says that the watch file
Hi Arturo,
On 09.02.2017 09:03, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> Ok, the package looks very good now.
>
> I uploaded it to unstable (it should go to the NEW queue).
Yeah! :) Thank you very much! I'm really happy about that.
> Things to address:
>
> * d/patches/0001-Delete-extra-COPYING-file-i
s the proablem with
the watch file. I think this it not too important, but please let me
know what you think about it.
Here is the link to the new package:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/audio-recorder
Yours
David
On 18.08.2016 13:22, David Rabel wrote:
> Hi Arturo,
>
> than
I am going to package this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Arturo,
thank you for your email. I wrote an email to the upstream developer,
asking him to change a few things. :-)
On 16.08.2016 09:47, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> On 15 August 2016 at 02:23, David Rabel wrote:
> The Makefile.in.in file seems like a file that should not be in
Hi,
on Friday the upstream author released a new version and so I spent a
good part of the weekend packaging. ;-)
I uploaded the package at mentors.debian.net :
https://mentors.debian.net/package/audio-recorder
But I've got a lot of questions and I hope you can help me:
1) lintian reports an er
Hi again,
the last release cannot be built on recent Debian versions because of
naming conflicts in the source code with libgtk-3-dev.
This is fixed in the current trunk of audio-recorder and I just wrote an
Email to the upstream author and asked him to release a new version of
audio-recorder, so
Hi again,
so I built a package for vim-lastplace addon. (
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825665 )
But now I am not sure if it is appreciated to have an extra package for
such a small addon. For me of course it would be nice to have a small
easy package to start as maintainer, b
Hi there,
I am interested in packaging this as I am using vim frequently and
looking for an easy package to start packaging for Debian.
I will try to package it, when I have some spare time in the next days,
and ask for sponsoring on debian mentors mailing list afterwards.
Kind Regards,
David
Hi Arturo,
I'm interested in maintaining this package. If I don't confuse this, I
used this program when I was using Linux Mint and now that I am using
Debian, I would like to see it included.
I have not yet contributed to Debian, so I have no experience in
maintaining packages. I already read th
28 matches
Mail list logo
