On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:34:04AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Sure. However, the URLs you provided me until now did not. Did I miss
> a way to get the real download URL from the click-one, without firing
> up a web browser?
I didn't understand how the .dsc file could be used until I started playing
:32PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Chris Frey wrote (29 May 2012 09:45:15 GMT) :
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:48:43AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> >> Commit 85a9d87f makes debian/rules stop passing
> >> "DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all" to dpkg-buildflags.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:48:43AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Commit 85a9d87f makes debian/rules stop passing
> "DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all" to dpkg-buildflags.
I was doing testing with and without the revert, and the lintian
tests did not improve. I plan to do a few more tests thoug
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:32:01PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> So, here's what Lintian tells me this time:
>
> * The no-symbols-control-file Lintian overrides were not updated.
> * The new hardening checks detect possible problems: I'll let you
> check, override false positives, and fix real probl
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:48:04PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> Hold the presses. I found one more issue. The pkg-config files need to
> be renamed to match the major version number (libbarry-18.pc instead of
> libbarry-0.pc).
>
> I'll be releasing 0.18.2 to fix this.
Ok, ve
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> My lintian command didn't catch the *.dsc files. Fixed that, and fixed
> all the above.
>
> Hopefully this is the one. :-)
>
> You can grab it in the usual place:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/pro
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:38:23AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> The trailing ":" is wrong in:
>
> Files: src/vformat.h src/vformat.c:
Oops, thanks.
> I also get:
>
> W: barry source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends barrybackup-gui-dbg
> W: barry source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libbarry18
On Fri, May 11, 2012, intrigeri wrote:
> Next review round results in:
Thanks :-)
> 1. debian/copyright may be syntaxically correct, but it looks weird
>compared to how people usually put things in there.
>Attached patch fixes this. Please consider applying it.
I applied the patch, with
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:22:48AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> > I'm assuming that you will do the actual upload?
>
> I will, once I'm happy with the state of the package.
Excellent. Thanks very much. Let me know if you find any
show stoppers. :-)
- Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:46:13PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> $ sudo apt-get install libconfig-model-perl
> $ cme check dpkg-copyright
> $ cme dump dpkg-copyright
Thanks intrigeri. The cme check did find a syntax oddity, although
the error message it produced was a bit cryptic. :-)
I believe this
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:38:29AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Looks like great work. Congrats!
Thanks for the feedback!
> * can you please convert debian/copyright to DEP5 format?
>(you're almost there, see http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/)
Is there a tool I can use to make sure I've got th
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:36:45PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> > The latest git sources from http://repo.or.cz/w/barry.git should
> > compile on sid, with no lintian warnings. Please let me know what
> > you think.
>
> Where can I find the corresponding orig.tar.gz?
I'm hoping to release a real 0.1
Hi intrigeri,
I'm hoping you're still interested in reviewing Barry for upload to
Debian sid.
As for Barry itself, there's only general documentation updates, and one
feature in the Desktop GUI that needs to be implemented before version 0.18
is released.
As for the Debian packaging, it is ready
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:53:19PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> Without opensync plugins, though, we should leave the Desktop out
> >> of Debian for now. Is there an easy way to make packages optional?
>
> There is, actually, a way to make your debian/control dynamic:
> http://lists.debia
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:33:14PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> > I named it opensync0 since that plugin depends on libopensync0, which
> > is available in Squeeze.
>
> libopensync0 was a binary library package built from the opensync
> source package. Using ABI numbers in such a binary package name
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 02:54:34PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> We don't wait until all previous Debian releases are EOL'd before we
> start following the latest Debian Policy. Please follow the latest
> available Standards-Version: Debian Policy 3.9.3 was released.
> See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:26:34AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> The answer is basically "none". Once can maintain a package in Debian
> (as is: doing maintenance work, being responsible, and being in the
> Maintainer: control field) without any kind of special status.
Excellent!
In the latest Barr
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:37:42AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi Chris!
>
> One month has passed, and nobody adopted the barry package in Debian;
> the Wheezy freeze will happen in a few months. I suggest you decide
> whether you want to take care of barry in Debian, so that we avoid
> uploading pa
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:20:10AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> I don't understand very well what you are expecting from the
> Debian maintainer. Be them anyone else or (soon?) yoursef, what they
> must put in debian/changelog is:
Oh, I know the changelog must be updated, but some maintainers have
th
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:04:42AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> > Changelog:
>
> > The changelog needs to be kept up to date in Debian. I've
> > tried to limit myself to just using my own entry at the top,
> > but I'm willing to find a better way to share that file if
> > downstr
20 matches
Mail list logo
