to peer network
owner 418080 !
tags 418080 + pending
thanks
I'd like to take over this package. It's a shame that it was
in badly shape and not shipped with etch.
I'll look to see if it is better suited for volatile than main
(beta version, I mean).
Anyway co-maintainers are, as a
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 02:52:13AM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've stumbled about the following bug in the Debian bug database today
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338128
>
> do you have any plans to submit your packages to the official Debian
> repository?
Y
Hi Macro,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:32:54PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:19:57AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> >
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Marco Nenciarini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: wengophone
> Version : 0.99+svn4179
why not openwengo as the package name btw?
> Upstream Author : Wengo SAS
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer use XMMS - haven't for close to a year now - so I'm
definitely not the best person to be looking after this package.
To the best of my knowledge, upstream doesn't work on this actively and
the bugs appear to be endian related. I'd recommend this package
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-11
Severity: normal
I no longer have the time, nor interest, to maintain xpvm. I originally
maintained it because my work at the time used it. I haven't personally
used xpvm for about 2 years.
Upstream is inactive -- I'd be very surprised if new versio
6 matches
Mail list logo
