Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 794634 by 826073
Bug #794634 [wnpp] ITP: lua-torch -- A scientific computing framework for
Lua(JIT)
794634 was blocked by: 818900
794634 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 794634: 826073
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Hi,
upstream has removed the file in question in SVN. I excluded it in the
repackaged source tarball and applied the patches needed to the
remaining files and re-uploaded. Fast-processing would be extremely
helpful.
Kind regards from Stockholm
Andreas.
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:00:23PM
Without checking: After Building you get a *.changes file. Open this
and check whether it has a Closes: line featuring all the bugs you want
to close.
Sorry for my brewity
Andreas.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:26:30AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one more question:
>
> Is the „Close
Package:wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: lumin
* Package name: lua-cwrap
Version : 0~20160222-gdbd0a62
Upstream Author : Torch Developers
* URL : https://github.com/torch/cwrap
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: lua
Descrip
Hi,
one more question:
Is the „Closes:“ line in changelog syntactically correct to close all the bugs?
-nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE ·
Hi Dominik,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:18AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> newest version is in collab-maint, issues seem to be resolved.
>
> Please test, and, if satisfied, feel free to upload ;).
Very good. Unfortunately I can not test before next Monday. Mike
if you can run a test and up
Hi,
newest version is in collab-maint, issues seem to be resolved.
Please test, and, if satisfied, feel free to upload ;).
Cheers,
Nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e
Hello Jonathan,
> I'd like to make sure that atom is in the debian repository before
> the freeze.
Do you still plan to work on this? If not, please release the ownership
of the bug.
Have you done anything yet? Can we help you to move forward? I would
gladly sponsor uploads for atom dependen
Hi
On Wed Jun 1 20:23:15 2016 GMT+0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > We tried to avoid updateing to a new upstream commit as the one in use was
> > well-tested, but looking through the changes, there has been a big diff,
> > but
> >
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> We tried to avoid updateing to a new upstream commit as the one in use was
> well-tested, but looking through the changes, there has been a big diff, but
> almost all of it seems to be fixing warnings and code formatting.
>
> So r
Hi,
> > While I do agree with you, please give us a few more days (three, let's
> > say) to find a workaround. I have something schemed, but need to find out
> > whether it is too ugly to share or not ;).
> >
Something new:
Upstream actually seems to have a patch that fixes this issue.
We trie
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:00:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825529: fixed in ariba 1.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825529,
regarding ITP: ariba -- Antibiotic Resistance Identification By Assembly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:00:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#823115: fixed in fastqtl 2.184+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #823115,
regarding ITP: FastQTL -- Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) mapper in cis for
molecular phenotypes
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#820924: fixed in ruby-premailer 1.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #820924,
regarding ITP: ruby-premailer -- Preflight for HTML e-mail
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 13:00:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#826001: fixed in ruby-health-check 1.5.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #826001,
regarding ITP: ruby-health-check -- check uptime of rails apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 13:00:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825999: fixed in ruby-base32 0.3.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825999,
regarding ITP: ruby-base32 -- library for base32 encoding and decoding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: Pirate Praveen
https://rubygems.org/gems/licensee
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: opencoarrays
Version : 1.6.0
Upstream Author : Alessandro Fanfarillo
* URL : http://www.opencoarrays.org/
4* License : BSD 3-Clause
Programming Lang: C, Fortran
Description : Co-
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:01:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824227: fixed in galileo 0.5.0~git160510-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824227,
regarding ITP: galileo -- Utility to securely synchronize a Fitbit device with
the Fitbit web service
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:01:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825969: fixed in openhft-affinity 2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825969,
regarding ITP: openhft-affinity -- OpenHFT Java Thread Affinity library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On Mi 01 Jun 2016 11:31:49 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
GTK3 and Qt5 are tricky in remote environments, anyway. It is mostly
because of upstream devs not being aware enough of remote desktop
technologies.
Personally, I think, we should / you should upload xrdp as is now to
Debian unstable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: graphlan
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Nicola Segata
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/nsegata/graphlan
* License : expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : circular representation
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: Pirate Praveen
https://rubygems.org/gems/health_check
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: Pirate Praveen
https://rubygems.org/gems/base32
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
> GTK3 and Qt5 are tricky in remote environments, anyway. It is mostly
> because of upstream devs not being aware enough of remote desktop
> technologies.
>
> Personally, I think, we should / you should upload xrdp as is now to
> Debian unstable (not experimental, really unstable) and open th
Hi Dominik, Andreas,
On Mi 01 Jun 2016 11:15:36 CEST, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They
seem to reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I
don't know yet. I
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
>
> We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They seem to
> reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I don't know yet. I
> also do not know yet whether this is a GTK/Qt bug or an x11rdp bug. We see
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 740172 ITP: libvpd -- VPD Database access library
Bug #740172 [wnpp] RFS: libvpd -- VPD Database access library
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: libvpd -- VPD Database access library' from 'RFS:
libvpd -- VPD Database access library'.
> retitle
Hi Gianfranco,
2 years ago, I created ITPs in Debian for 5 softwares that are part of RAS
(reliability, availability, and serviceability) tools, used on powerpc, ppc64,
ppc64el.
The packages were taken by Ubuntu devs. Now there are in Ubuntu since Trusty
but not Debian. I asked two times for help,
Hi,
>> I've scheduled a session for that at our organisation's meeting this
>weekend.
>
>Any outcome of this session?
Yes, to some extent.
We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They seem to
reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I don't know yet. I also
d
Processing control commands:
> owner -1 !
Bug #813096 [wnpp] ITP: logdata-anomaly-miner -- lightweight tool for log
checking, log analysis
Owner changed from Roman Fiedler to Gianfranco
Costamagna .
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #813096 [wnpp] ITP: logdata-anomaly-miner -- lightweight tool for log
ch
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets review:
1) one single changelog entry and close the ITP bug
2) lintian
W: logdata-anomaly-miner: readme-debian-contains-debmake-template
E: logdata-anomaly-miner: description-starts-with-package-name
W: logdata-anomaly-miner: description-st
Some time ago, I packaged lsvpd which is used on powerpc/ppc64/ppc64el and it
got accepted in Ubuntu Trusty and the followings.
I'd like to see it in Debian ; I already sent two calls for this inclusion :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2014/10/msg00020.html
https://lists.debian.org/de
Some time ago, I packaged libservicelog which is used on powerpc/ppc64/ppc64el
and it
got accepted in Ubuntu Trusty and the followings.
I'd like to see it in Debian ; I already sent two calls for this inclusion :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2014/10/msg00020.html
https://lists.debi
Some time ago, I packaged servicelog which is used on powerpc/ppc64/ppc64el and
it
got accepted in Ubuntu Trusty and the followings.
I'd like to see it in Debian ; I already sent two calls for this inclusion :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2014/10/msg00020.html
https://lists.debian.
Some time ago, I packaged ppc64-diag which is used on powerpc/ppc64/ppc64el and
it
got accepted in Ubuntu Trusty and the followings.
I'd like to see it in Debian ; I already sent two calls for this inclusion :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2014/10/msg00020.html
https://lists.debian.
Some time ago, I packaged libvpd which is used on powerpc/ppc64/ppc64el and it
got accepted in Ubuntu Trusty and the followings.
I'd like to see it in Debian ; I already sent two calls for this inclusion :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2014/10/msg00020.html
https://lists.debian.org/d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 740173 RFS: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
Bug #740173 [wnpp] RFP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data
(VPD)' fro
38 matches
Mail list logo
