Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 693492 Dmitry Smirnov
Bug #693492 [wnpp] ITP: litecoin -- peer-to-peer network based digital currency
Owner recorded as Dmitry Smirnov .
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
693492: http://bugs.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 691813 by 693495
Bug #691813 [wnpp] ITA: wmtime -- Window Maker dockapp that displays the time
and date
691813 was not blocked by any bugs.
691813 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 691813: 693495
> stop
Stopping processing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Package name: litecoin
Version: 0.6.3c
Upstream Author: Litecoin Developers
URL: https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin
License: MIT/X11, ISC
Description: peer-to-peer network base
What degree of separation is required before a fork becomes non-redundant?
How is this evaluated? You have provided some valid reasoning against
including mdm in its current state, however that is off the topic of this
thread.
A substantial amount of work has gone into Nemo since it was forked s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 693481 !
Bug #693481 [wnpp] ITP: python-webm -- python interface to the Google WebM
video/image codec
Owner recorded as Dmitry Smirnov .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
693481: http://bugs.d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Package name: python-webm
Version: 0.2.2
Upstream Author: Daniele Esposti
URL: https://code.google.com/p/python-webm
License: BSD-2-clause (modified)
Description: python interface to th
* Mathieu Parent , 2012-11-15, 15:18:
I have packaged my first python package. I have read the "Debian Python
Policy ", but I need a review from the experts here ;-)
A few hints regarding seeking sponsorship:
1) Tell us exactly where can we get your package: give us a link to .dsc
or a VCS URL
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Friday 16 November 19:03:14 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: ruby-vegas
> tags 622654 + pending
Bug #622654 [wnpp] ITP: ruby-vegas -
Hi,
Is there any news on the packaging of opengtl since september 2011 ?
Regards,
Adrien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201211161902.20004.adrien.gr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 692563 ITP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Call Framework (RCF) is a portable
> IPC/RPC middleware framework for C++ applications
Bug #692563 [wnpp] "ITP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Call Framework (RCF) is a
portable IPC/RPC middleware framework for C++
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 692563 "ITP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Call Framework (RCF) is a portable
> IPC/RPC middleware framework for C++ applications"
Bug #692563 [wnpp] "ITP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Call Framework (RCF) is a
Changed Bug title to '"ITP: librcf-cpp -- Re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: pycessing
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Brendan Howell
* URL : http://pycessing.org
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : python base
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 692563 "ITP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Call Framework (RCF) is a
Bug #692563 [wnpp] ITP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Call Framework (RCF) is a portable
Changed Bug title to '"ITP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Call Framework (RCF) is a'
from 'ITP: librcf-cpp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 692563 mar...@kotsbak.com
Bug #692563 [wnpp] RFP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Call Framework (RCF) is a portable
IPC/RPC middleware framework for C++ applications.
Owner recorded as mar...@kotsbak.com.
> retitle 692563 ITP: librcf-cpp -- Remote Ca
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 622654 ITP: ruby-vegas -- create executable versions of Sinatra/Rack
> apps
Bug #622654 [wnpp] ITP: ruby-vegas -- create executable versions of
Sinatra/Rack apps
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#622654 to the same title
> than
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 622654 ITP: ruby-vegas -- create executable versions of Sinatra/Rack
> apps
Bug #622654 [wnpp] ITP: ruby-vegas -- create executable versions of
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: ruby-vegas -- create executable versions of
Sinatra/Rack apps' fro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 622654 Praveen
Bug #622654 [wnpp] ITP: vegas -- Vegas aims to solve the simple problem of
creating executable versions of Sinatra/Rack apps
Owner changed from Ankit Gupta to Praveen
.
> retitle 622654 ITP: ruby-vegas -- create executable
On 16 November 2012 20:36, Axel Beckert wrote:
> We used cron-apt before for a long time. It just does upgrades or mail
> about pending upgrades and as far as I know you can't tell them that
> they should upgrade some packages and some not.
On a single system, possible, since you basically specif
Am 16.11.2012 12:17, schrieb Jon Dowland:
Why not. I haven't been for a while but I'll happily fire them off an
email.
Thanks for taking care of that!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 10 October 2012 23:02, Elmar S. Heeb wrote:
> > Framework to use aptitude for automated package management including
> > upgrade, installation, removal, hold, etc. Allows you to automate what
> > you would manually do with aptitude.
>
> See also pkgsync, cron-apt,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:01:24PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 16.11.2012 11:32, schrieb Jon Dowland:
> >Long term I think I probably agree with you. We should probably not
> >have both in jessie. But, I'd like to give prboom+ a proper evaluation
> >before I'd consider dropping prboom - so
Am 16.11.2012 11:32, schrieb Jon Dowland:
Long term I think I probably agree with you. We should probably not
have both in jessie. But, I'd like to give prboom+ a proper evaluation
before I'd consider dropping prboom - so I think they should coexist
prior to the next release, so prboom+ gets plen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 673637 ITA: tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder
Bug #673637 [wnpp] O: tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder' from 'O: tcpflow --
TCP flow recorder'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
I intend to adopt this package
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1TZJPq-0002vs-Ms@shorty.local
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:00:29PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> I'd like to move forward with packaging prboom-plus, but I find it
> unacceptable to maintain two forks of such similarity in Debian...
Long term I think I probably agree with you. We should probably not
have both in jessie. But,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # package arpwatch: bugs O 686996 and O 693374 are not merged
> merge 693374 686996
Bug #693374 [wnpp] O: arpwatch -- Ethernet/FDDI station activity monitor
Bug #686996 [wnpp] O: arpwatch -- Ethernet/FDDI station activity monitor
Merged 686996 693
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 693229 O: crashmail -- JAM and *.MSG capable Fidonet tosser
Bug #693229 [wnpp] O: crashmail
Changed Bug title to 'O: crashmail -- JAM and *.MSG capable Fidonet tosser'
from 'O: crashmail'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Since I am not so much into LaTeX related software anymore, I would like to
request an adopter for
the package pybtex. cf. http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pybtex.html
Greetings,
Daniel Stender
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
What is the status of this package?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CABP4BswDK74KOMvH=DcjB7M9fOVD1114t=b8m79p6v1lmvn...@mail.gmail.com
29 matches
Mail list logo
