Arthur Loiret wrote:
Hello,
I've already contacted you by mail two months ago to ask you if you were
interested in co-maintaining tbb, but you didn't answer so please let me
know if you are still interested in packaging tbb.
Otherwise, I have an almost ready package here:
http://mentors.debian.
Arthur Loiret wrote:
> Otherwise, I have an almost ready package here:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tbb20/tbb20_20070719-1.dsc
This package fails to build on my i386 lenny system - it appears to be missing a
build dependency.
build/linux.inc attempts to call a binary called arc
Hello,
I've already contacted you by mail two months ago to ask you if you were
interested in co-maintaining tbb, but you didn't answer so please let me
know if you are still interested in packaging tbb.
Otherwise, I have an almost ready package here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: docbook-xsl-xalan
Version : 1.00
Upstream Author : Norman Walsh and members of the DocBook project.
* URL : http://wiki.docbook.org/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 348970 pending
Bug#348970: ITP: ldns -- dns client utilities
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 376506 pending
Bug#376506: ITP: vpb-driver -- Voicetronix telephony hardware s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ptop
Version : 3.6.1~b1
Upstream Author : Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ptop/
* License : BSD License
Programming Lang: C
Description
Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems every other semi-controversial ITP gets an obligatory "why
> package this when we have X,Y,Z instead?" reply, although seemingly
> never from an ftp-master or mirror maintainer or anyone else who is
> actually impacted by archive sizes :-(
Consid
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:47:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427083: fixed in wmmixer 1.5-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414531: fixed in wmcube 0.98-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:23:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #431186,ITP: liblocale-hebrew-perl -- bidirectional (BiDi)
Hebrew support for perl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:14:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #401512,ITP: ccpublisher -- tags and optionally uploads your
media to the Internet Archive website
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtext-bidi-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Moshe Kamensky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~kamensky/Text-Bidi-0.03/
* License : Artistic
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package : yorick-ytk
Version : 2+cvs
Upstream Author : C. Wayne Wright
* URL : http://ytk.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : Tcl/Tk interface for the Yorick language
Yorick is an interpreted computer lang
Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 à 15:01 +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
> It seems every other semi-controversial ITP gets an obligatory "why
> package this when we have X,Y,Z instead?" reply, although seemingly
> never from an ftp-master or mirror maintainer or anyone else who is
> actually impacted by arch
http://dnfapet.storylate.net/?627912157916
Check our offer below to find out how much you can save.
Todays price off:
CI- 2.69$ -ALIS
VIAG- 1.88$ -RA SOFT
CIAL- 3.93$ -IS SOFT
VI- $1.79 -AGRA
And thats not all. Go on
http://dnfapet.storylate.net/?627912157916
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427081: fixed in wmtimer 2.92-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
> for Debian, what is the point of adding another? Especially when it is
> non-free.
Firstly, as it is non-free, it isn't really going "into Debian".
Second
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: svn-pusher
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://web-cpan.berlios.de/modules/SVN-Pusher/
* License
Want to have sex with ...?
mail me now!
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Kompozer now has a Debian package for download from their website
http://www.kompozer.net. Could this be incoporated into the Debian
repository?
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.15
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 446057 pending
Bug#446057: ITP: uspp -- Universal Serial Port Python library
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 09:42 +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > The only rationale for removing the *firmware* is compliance with GR
> > 2006-004...
>
> Am I missing something here? Didn't that GR fail?
>
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004
There's no need for
Hi,
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> The only rationale for removing the *firmware* is compliance with GR
> 2006-004...
Am I missing something here? Didn't that GR fail?
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
23 matches
Mail list logo