Processed: emelfm2

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 350855 ITP: emelfm2 -- file manager for UNIX-like operating Bug#350855: RFP: emelfm2 -- file manager for UNIX-like operating systems Changed Bug title. > systems Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > owner 350855 ! Bug#350855: I

Processed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] classic is dead, please remove wmufo

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 294316 ftp.debian.org Bug#294316: RFA: wmufo -- This is wmseti on steroids! Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 294316 RM: wmufo -- RoQA, orphaned, obsolete, non-functional Bug#294316: RFA: wmufo -- This is wmseti

Bug#294316: [EMAIL PROTECTED] classic is dead, please remove wmufo

2006-02-03 Thread Nathanael Nerode
reassign 294316 ftp.debian.org retitle 294316 RM: wmufo -- RoQA, orphaned, obsolete, non-functional thanks wmufo suffers from the same problem as several other packages. It works only with [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classic, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classic is now a dead project which isn't accepting any wo

Bug#351318: ITP: libflaim - Embeddable cross-platform database engine

2006-02-03 Thread Martin Meredith
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist I intend to package libflaim for debian (for use with iFolder and simias) FLAIM is an embeddable cross-platform database engine that provides a rich, powerful, easy-to-use feature set. It is the database engine used by Novell eDirectory. It has proven to be hig

Processed: gdmap

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 345898 ITP: gdmap -- Diskspace usage visualizer Bug#345898: RFP: gdmap -- Graphical Disk Map is an utility that allows one to visualize disk space with one single picture Changed Bug title. > owner 345898 ! Bug#345898: ITP: gdmap -- Diskspac

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
By architectures I mean i386, powerpc, sparc, S390, mips, m68k, AMD64, etc. http://www.debian.org/ports/ > you should first make sure gcj is functional on these 11 architectures. No real need to check ahead of time - gcj will either work on a given architecture or it won't. We just want to be in

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Andi Vajda
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: I use Apple's JDK on Mac OS X, my main development platform. Oh yeah. There is one more technical factor to add into the mix, hopefully people's heads aren't ready to explode. Debian supports a lot of architecture, I think the current number is 11.

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
> I use Apple's JDK on Mac OS X, my main development platform. Oh yeah. There is one more technical factor to add into the mix, hopefully people's heads aren't ready to explode. Debian supports a lot of architecture, I think the current number is 11. There are autobuilders for all of these archit

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Andi, Debian's infrastructure is designed such that a source package is not allowed to be a build dependency. Matthew, please file a wishlist bug against swig, requesting a version update. >Okay, I'll try to build it with a free software java stack. >However, if that proves too difficult is buildi

Processed: Use source package name

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 347193 ITA: sqlobject -- Object Relational Manager for providing an > object interface to your database Bug#347193: ITA: python-sqlobject -- Object Relational Manager for providing an object interface to your database Changed Bug title. > End

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Andi Vajda
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Matthew O'Connor wrote: I'll play around with trying to get this to work. Andi, when you normally compile the Lucene code which JDK do you use and on which platform (sorry if you answered this elsewhere)? Before I begin I want to verify I can at least reproduce what Andi i

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Matthew O'Connor
Jeff Breidenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Andi is correct, Java Lucene 1.4.3 compiles ok with a Free Software > toolchain. Specifically we use kaffe. Getting this to work took a lot > of time and effort. It is unknown at this time whether the release > candidate for Java Lucene 1.9 can be built

Processed: Add missing owner

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 350835 Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#350835: ITA: equivs -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies Owner recorded as Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: Re: ITA: isic -- Test the integrity of an IP Stack with semi-random packets

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 327667 O: isic -- Test the integrity of an IP Stack with semi-random > packets Bug#327667: ITA: isic -- Test the integrity of an IP Stack with semi-random packets Changed Bug title. > noowner 327667 Bug#327667: O: isic -- Test the integrity o

Bug#327667: ITA: isic -- Test the integrity of an IP Stack with semi-random packets

2006-02-03 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 327667 O: isic -- Test the integrity of an IP Stack with semi-random packets noowner 327667 thanks On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 18:46:08 +0100, Matej Vela wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:27:41 +, Ernesto Crespo wrote: >> retitle 327667 ITA: isic -- Test the integrity of an IP Stack wit

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Andi Vajda
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: Once there is a Debian Java Lucene 1.9 source package available, the PyLucene 1.9 package could be made to depend on it, unpack it, apply the patches, build it (and not install it) and then build itself. Seems pretty straightforward to me. Sorry, th

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I'm dropping the Debian Java package maintainers from the CC: list. Individuals can join in if they want. Andi is correct, Java Lucene 1.4.3 compiles ok with a Free Software toolchain. Specifically we use kaffe. Getting this to work took a lot of time and effort. It is unknown at this time whethe

Bug#351276: ITP: python-dsv -- Python module for delimiter-separated-value files

2006-02-03 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: python-dsv Version : 1.4.0 Upstream Author : Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/python-dsv/ * License : standard CNRI Python license

Please I need your sponsorship

2006-02-03 Thread cecil brown
Dear sir I am Cecil Brown, a Liberian living in the Ivory Coast.During the war in Liberia, my father got kill by unknown arm men, why my mother, little brothers and sisters try to escape to a save heaven, I got missing from them, up to now I have not heard any news aboutthem. I found my way with

Bug#351270: ITP: libgpgme-ruby -- GPGME bindings for the Ruby language

2006-02-03 Thread Thierry Reding
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libgpgme-ruby Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Daiki Ueno * URL : http://deisui.org/~ueno/ruby/ruby-gpgme/ * License : GPL Description : GPGME bindings for the Ruby language GnuPG Made Easy (GPGME) is a li

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Andi Vajda
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Matthew O'Connor wrote: Personally, I'm fine with it going into contrib. I'd like it to go into main but that's probably not feasible unless there's a DFSG-free JDK that could compile it. If Java Lucene exists as a Debian package already, then this problem must have been

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Andi Vajda
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: Another possibility - maybe - is to package an older version of PyLucene that depends on Java Lucene 1.4.3. However, I suspect there are likely to be similar issues and an upatched Java Lucene 1.4.3 will not be a viable build dependency either. The

Processed: your mail

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 351253 Bug#351253: Please allow disabling of notification-daemon messages 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Joachim Breitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 283088 B

Processed: (no subject)

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 348069 firefox Bug#348069: ITP: firefox-bidiui -- Enable Firefox user interface BiDi options by default Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `firefox'. > retitle 348069 firefox: please enable RTL support by default Bug#348069: ITP: firefox-b

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Matthew O'Connor
Jeff Breidenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Given Andi's comments, one possibility is to put the PyLucene package > into Debian, but under the contrib section and marking it with appropriate > bug entries. The hope would be people could improve the build situation > over time. Personally, I'm fine

Bug#265585: status of bitpim packaging?

2006-02-03 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Greetings. Having recently acquired an LG phone and placed an order for a suitable USB cable, I've naturally developed an interest in bitpim. Is there anything I could do to help get it into the archive? (I'd be willing to maintain it on my own if neither of you is still interested, though I'd pr

Bug#351242: ITP: sickle -- mail filtering tool for IMAP

2006-02-03 Thread Gonéri Le Bouder
Francesco P. Lovergine a écrit : On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:31PM +0100, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: * Package name: sickle Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Duncan Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.codebunny.org/coding/sickle/ * License : BSD De

Bug#351242: ITP: sickle -- mail filtering tool for IMAP

2006-02-03 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:31PM +0100, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: > * Package name: sickle > Version : 0.3 > Upstream Author : Duncan Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.codebunny.org/coding/sickle/ > * License : BSD > Description : mail filt

Bug#351242: ITP: sickle -- mail filtering tool for IMAP

2006-02-03 Thread Gonéri Le Bouder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: sickle Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Duncan Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.codebunny.org/coding/sickle/ * License : BSD Description : mail fi

Bug#311367: Any progress

2006-02-03 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 03 February 2006 20:26, you wrote: > I see that Mark Purcell (CC'ed) has created an alioth project for > packaging mythtv [1], but I cannot see any progress on that side yet. If you are just after some mythtv deb's then you should grab them from: deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/

Bug#351226: ITP: mono-heap-prof -- Mono Heap Profiler

2006-02-03 Thread Mirco Bauer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mono-heap-prof Version : 0.0+svn.r56265 Upstream Author : Ben Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.go-mono.org * License : X11 Description : Mono Heap Profiler This package contains a heap profile

Bug#334241: marked as done (ITP: python-mechanize -- stateful programmatic web browsing)

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 03:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334241: fixed in python-mechanize 0.0.11a-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#334269: marked as done (ITP: python-pullparser -- simple "pull API" for HTML parsing)

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 03:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334269: fixed in python-pullparser 0.0.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#272057: marked as done (ITP: clientform -- ClientForm is a Python module for handling HTML forms on the client side)

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 03:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272057: fixed in python-clientform 0.2.0.99-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: ITA: wmitime -- yet another clock dock app for Window Maker

2006-02-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package wnpp Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp > retitle 349245 ITA: wmitime -- yet another clock dock app for Window Maker Bug#349245: O: wmitime -- yet another clock dock app for Window Maker Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#330167: status

2006-02-03 Thread César Gómez Martín
No open bugs. Thanks for leaving this package in good shape. To adopt gbatnav I must repackage it as the new maintainer. Here it is, version 1.0.4cvs20051004-3: http://www.cek.bitacoras.com/debian/ I'm looking for a sponsor to verify and upload it. Thanks in advance, César.

Bug#311367: Any progress

2006-02-03 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi, I see that Mark Purcell (CC'ed) has created an alioth project for packaging mythtv [1], but I cannot see any progress on that side yet. Marc, could you please give a status update in this bug trail? Thanks [1] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-mythtv/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package

2006-02-03 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Matthew, Given Andi's comments, one possibility is to put the PyLucene package into Debian, but under the contrib section and marking it with appropriate bug entries. The hope would be people could improve the build situation over time. Another possibility - maybe - is to package an older version

Bug#350336: ITP: latex-mk -- tool for managing LaTeX projects

2006-02-03 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-03 02:11]: > Yes, when I will have some free time. Probably one or two months from > now. But, it is possible that I try to merge my work with latex-mk. > I do not look at it in details yet. So I do not know if it is > possible or not. That would be