Are you aware of "toolchain-source-newlib"?
Considering that newlib is targetted to embedded systems, what is the
advantage of having binary compiled version of newlib while there is
already a package of newlib source integrating with toolchain-source?
Seo Sanghyeon
Hi all again.
El Domingo, 21 de Noviembre de 2004 16:01, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
> I can start working on it again if you want, and merge you last package
> with the mine one (with the last upstream version, of course). If Joerg or
> Frank aren't interested in a permanent sponsorship, I can ask
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Sounds like you need to expand your repertoire a bit.
Possibly so, but unfortunately my time is a finite. There are far too
many languages (even in debian main) for me to learn them all.
Can you imagine a world in which your argument was taken at face value?
There w
I'm building a rekall package now and will upload it to experimental in
the next few days unless someone objects.
It looks like an interesting package,
Shaun---potentially an important package.
> * Package name: newlib
> Version : 1.12.0.20041126
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : http://sources.redhat.com/newlib/
> * License : GPL, LGPL, BSD, and others
> De
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of use?
We're talking about free software. Modifying it to fit your needs is
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> >>The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> >>in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> >>it in the first place).
> >
> >
> >How is that an
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Package name: mpegdemux
> Version : 0.1.2
> Upstream Author : Hampa Hug
> URL : http://www.hampa.ch/mpegdemux/
> License : GPL version 2
>
> Description: a MPEG1/2 system stream demultiplex
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: courier-analog
Version: 0.12
Upstream Author: Sam Varshavchik
URL: http://www.courier-mta.org
License: GPLv2
Description:
Courier-analog generates log summaries for incoming
and outgoing SMTP connections, and IMAP and POP3 activity.
.
courier-ana
libapache-mod-ntlm uploaded to mentors.debian.net
Hope this'll help.
Cheers,
--
Olivier LEMAIRE, aka LEM
http://olivier-lemaire.org/
chgrep package uploaded to mentors.debian.net
Hope this'll help.
Cheers,
--
Olivier LEMAIRE, aka LEM
http://olivier-lemaire.org/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mpegdemux
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Hampa Hug
URL : http://www.hampa.ch/mpegdemux/
License : GPL version 2
Description: a MPEG1/2 system stream demultiplexer
Mpegdemux is an MPEG1/MPEG2 system stream demultipl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 223568 283282
Bug#223568: RFP: hotbabe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
Bug#283282: RFP: hot-babe -- system activity monitor
Merged 223568 283282.
> merge 283282 283578
Bug#283282: RFP: hot-babe -- system activity monitor
Bug#283578: I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ossim
Version : 0.9.7
Upstream Author : OSSIM development team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ossim.net/
* License : BSD-style
Description : security information manager
A framework for centralizin
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:53:34PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> I'm collecting a few hints and patches in BTS, as well as contacting
> reports for clarifications and information. I could upload
s/reports/reporters/ :)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
> > Well, if one had a small system and desired not to install ruby, it
> > would still be possible to obtain pdumpfs' functionality. Of course
> > that could be called an installation issue rather than a usability
> > issue.
>
> 3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to sto
> > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > operates?
>
> Or storebackup?
>
> (Actually, storebackup's one-line description doesn't really hint at
> this functionality. But I'm using it to create
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:49:44PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> > in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> > it in the first place).
> How is that an advantage of use?
One may want to use
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:31:32AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > The poor man's daily snapshot, glastree builds live backup trees, with
> > branches for each day. Users directly browse the past to recover older
> > documents or retri
Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:09:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278630: close, wrong email adress
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:30:33PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:03:34PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > autofs needs VERY urgent cares in order to have it working properly
> > in sarge. Do you need help to adopt it currently? There are a few
> > patches a
Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:42:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278627: close, wrong email address
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello, I have packaged daapd, a daemon that scans a directory of mp3 files
and shares them on the local network via the Apple DAA protocol. Together
with mdnsresponder (a Depends:) this makes your library available to
iTunes. You can also do fun tricks like forward the daapd ports over ssh
and ge
Ashley T. Howes wrote:
lavaps is already part of the Debian archive. In a wishlist bug report
(#243328), a TCL/TK version was asked for. I now intend to create one.
All the information relating to the new package is the same as the
original, but I include it here again for reference.
Does tha
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004, Charles Fry wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > > > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > > > operates?
> > >
> > > glastree prov
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 279522 ITA: thttpd -- Support utilities for thttpd
Bug#279522: O: thttpd -- Support utilities for thttpd
Changed Bug title.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 250414 ITA: Lisp Universal Shell
Bug#250414: O: lush -- Lisp Universal Shell
Changed Bug title.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Hello Era,
Any progess on this?
Thanks,
Ardo
era eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've exchanged email with Ardo van Rangelrooij, the previous
> maintainer, and I'm fortunate to report that he says he is happy to
> sponsor me.
>
> He also mentions that the previous upstream appears to be d
28 matches
Mail list logo
