Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle #235636 ITA: libipc-sharelite-perl -- Perl module that provides a
> simple interface to shared memory
Bug#235636: O: libipc-sharelite-perl -- Perl module that provides a simple
interface to shared memory
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping p
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 18:37, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:24:08PM -0800, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
>
> > * Package name: picocom
> > Version : 1.1
> > Upstream Author : Nick Patavalis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > * URL
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:24:08PM -0800, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> * Package name: picocom
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Nick Patavalis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> * URL : http://efault.net/npat/hacks/picocom/
> * License : GPL
Package: wnpp
I no longer use tkisem, and am therefore orphaning it.
(I packaged it because I was teaching a course using SPARC assembler.
If no one else wants to maintain it, it would not be the end of the
world if tkisem were removed from Debian. On the other hand, it
wouldn't be much work to
Package: wnpp
I no longer use binutils-sparc, and am therefore orphaning it.
Its only purpose (for me) was as an accessory to tkisem, which I am
also orphaning.
It is trivial to maintain: change literally a few characters in
binutils-avr. In fact a general package that generated binutils-xxx
for
Just so people don't think this is being completely neglected...
I've built a preliminary package, and then discovered that it can't cope
with devfs. Super.
I've sent a number of emails to upstream, ranging from "Hi, I'm going to
package up your software for Debian" to "Hey, this thing doesn't w
Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:04:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Uploaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: picocom
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Nick Patavalis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://efault.net/npat/hacks/picocom/
* License : GPL
Description : minimal dumb-terminal emulation program
picocom was des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: clpbar
Version : 1.0.8
Upstream Author : Michael Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://clpbar.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : a program to show information about a data transfer
Bar is a sim
So, I think this is an _excellent_ idea for a tool for Debian.
Some other ideas for data sources that might be worth thinking about:
* BTS. How many bugs, and maybe ratio of bugs to installations,
etc.
* Dependencies. How many other packages depend on this one? Gives
a rou
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Interested?
I don't have any particular interest, but if nobody else wants to
package it I might get around to it eventually.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Go ahead with my blessing and hijack the ITP... I've been too busy
unfortunately with personal matters (read: divorce) and haven't had much
time to deal with extra things. I had also ran into problems with the
upstream packaging of the code as well that was making it tedious to put
together
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 233280 + pending
Bug#233280: ITP: squidview -- monitors and analyzes your squid's - access.log
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
> However, I have to agree with Gustavo regarding the name. This
> isn't really a tool of the same genre as the apt toolset and the name is
> misleading
This program is really related to apt. What it does it to parse the output
of
apt-cache and adds a score to each package line (in that I like apt
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | A really useful tool (written in Python) that should have been written
> | long ago already. If nobody opposes, I'll upload shortly (in the hope
> | NEW will get unstuck soon).
>
> Any progress in packaging this? I couldn't find it in unstable at
> l
* Julien BLACHE
| A really useful tool (written in Python) that should have been written
| long ago already. If nobody opposes, I'll upload shortly (in the hope
| NEW will get unstuck soon).
Any progress in packaging this? I couldn't find it in unstable at
least.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 14:32, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Looks like 'apt for the people' to me. I would not really use the apt
> namespace for that package, and have something that mentions 'packages'
> in the name, I guess.
Mathieu:
I really
Em Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:11:34 +0100, "chatiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > The name of this package is really really misleading.
>
> I'll change the name to "apt-popular" as sugested by M. Brentrup
> unless there's a better suggestion ...
Looks like 'apt for the people' to me. I would not r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 220431 "ITA: mozart -- The Mozart Programming System"
Bug#220431: O: mozart -- The Mozart Programming System
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 230690 "ITA: mozart-stdlib -- The Mozart Programming System (Standard
> Library)"
Bug#230690: O: mozart-s
I've been working on packaging it, however have some other issues, that prevent
me from releasing those packages. (linphone things, some testing that i need to
do).
I can give you access to some fresh ones after weekend if interested and yes,
i'm definatly looking at adopting this one.
Regards,
M
Any news on this?
Its been almost 4 months since the last update.
Martin, if Jeremy isn't interested, why don't you take over and
upload? I'm interested in this package and available if you need
assistance.
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$supe
- Original Message -
From: "Mathieu Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "chatiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian Developers List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#235806: ITP: apt-best -- [...]
>
> Popularity is in no way synonym of best quality (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
When I didn't find a Debian package for cabot, I was intending to
package it. But than I found your intent.
Why isn't it packaged yet? Can I help or will it soon be packaged?
I think even if there are some bugs left, it's better to package it
ri
Popularity is in no way synonym of best quality (just think about
which OS is currently the most popular).
The name of this package is really really misleading.
chatiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: apt-best
> Version : 0.2
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: papercut
Version : 0.9.12
Upstream Author : Joao Prado Maia
* URL : http://www.papercut.org/
* License : BSD
Description : nntp server frontend for webbased forums
Papercut is a news server written in Pyth
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 235806 apt-best -- finding the most popular debian packages
Bug#235806: apt-best is a utility to help users in finding the most
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 235806 apt-best is a utility to help users in finding the most
Bug#235806: ITP: apt-best -- apt-best is a utility to help users in finding the
most popular debian packages. For that, it uses the popularity scores found in
different sources (fr
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm orphaning hunglish, because I'm unable to communicate with the
upstream normally.
Package description:
Hunglish provides an English-Hungarian dual keyboard layout. The layout
is the same both on the linux console and under X. The package provides
full support fo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Mar 2004 01:25:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218144: fixed in highlight 2.0.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 235140 ITA: gq -- GTK-based LDAP client
Bug#235140: RFA: gq -- GTK-based LDAP client
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 221915 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#221915: ITP: udev -- /dev/ management daemon
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 221915 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#221915: ITP: udev -- /dev/ management daemon
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Your message dated Wed, 03 Mar 2004 01:21:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231780: fixed in apollon 0.9.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Mar 2004 01:15:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148690: fixed in lingoteach-ui 0.3.9a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
retitle 235140 ITA: gq -- GTK-based LDAP client
thanks
Hi,
I use gq at home and for work, and I'm having a nice experience with the
upstream beta version, which solves the majority of the reported bugs.
I know LDAP quite well, but I'm not a gtk expert... :/
Anyway, if no one better shows up I'
Your message dated Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:58:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#172929: fixed in visualboyadvance 1.7.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:30:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#154383: fixed in okle 0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
37 matches
Mail list logo
