> > > Jext meets all your needs! Developers will also appreciate the open
> > > architecture of Jext. Based on GPLed libraries, internal Python
> > > interpreter and many XML files, improving Jext is an easy job.
> > > You can even write your own plugins (in Python or Java).
> >
> > Could
I've been missing this cli feature for quite some time now. I would like
to know where we stand with this hardware? And I could do some beta
testing, if required?
Flexy
Hi,
Le samedi 16 août 2003 à 20:19 +0200, Romain FRANCOISE a écrit :
> Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Package name: jext
> > Version : 3.2pre3
> > Upstream Author : Romain GUY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://www.jext.org/
> > * License
Package: wnpp
URL: http://wmalbum.sourceforge.net/
LICENSE: GPL
Package: wmalbum
Descriptions: wmalbum is a WindowMaker dock applet that displays album covers
for
songs being played by XMMS. You must already have images of the album
covers stored near the file being played. WMAlbum provides a ha
Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Package name: jext
> Version : 3.2pre3
> Upstream Author : Romain GUY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.jext.org/
> * License : GPL
> Description : A source code editor written in Java
The homepage has
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-16
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: rss-glx
Version : 0.7.5
Upstream Author : Tugrul Galatali
* URL : http://rss-glx.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description :
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-16
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I intend to orphan the rsxs package. It has gone incredibly unmaintained
upstream, and there is a much better alternative, rss-glx, which I plan
to package instead. If this pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 205705 ITP: jext a source code editor written in Java
Bug#205705: RFP: jext -- Java source code editor under GPL
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-16
Followup-For: Bug #205705
* Package name: jext
Version : 3.2pre3
Upstream Author : Romain GUY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.jext.org/
* License : GPL
Description : A source code editor writte
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-16
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jext
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.jext.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Java source code editor
Jext was created
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Bugs tagged 'fixed' should be closed
> close 178019
Bug#178019: ITP: libtest-builder-tester-perl -- Helper testing library for
Test::Builder tests
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 205681 ITA: which -- Shows the full path of (shell) commands
Bug#205681: O: which -- Shows the full path of (shell) commands
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nukeimage
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Fabricio Campos Zuardi; Ted Mielczarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ted.mielczarek.org/code/mozilla/
* License : triple-licensed MPL/GPL/LGPL
Description : Moz
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: juman
Version : 4.0
Upstream Author : Sadao Kurohashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.kc.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/nl-resource/juman.html
* License : BSD
Description : a Japanese Morphological Analysis System
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 05:02:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204500: fixed in tictactoe 0.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 05:03:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202172: fixed in cgiwrap 3.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 201363 ITA: mrtg -- Multi Router Traffic Grapher (contributed files)
Bug#201363: RFA: mrtg -- Multi Router Traffic Grapher (contributed files)
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:45:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#187139: fixed in python-fixedpoint 0.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:37:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200355: fixed in csound 4.23f04-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:30:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204804: fixed in libopm 08082003-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:23:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#160024: fixed in c2n 1.1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:34:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204961: fixed in gdesklets 0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:21:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195593: fixed in nast 0.1.7e-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:59:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203712: fixed in irqbalance 0.06-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:08:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203565: fixed in libclass-factory-util-perl 1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:12:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#173990: fixed in gnotime 2.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:05:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195313: fixed in libopenhbci-plugin-ddvcard 0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:03:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204939: fixed in late 0.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:47:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204761: fixed in apoo 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:41:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193093: fixed in pgpdump 0.19-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:25:39 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202702: fixed in libsql-abstract-perl 1.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:30:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202930: fixed in openoffice.org-dictionaries 20030617-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 178029 + fixed
Bug#178029: ITP: libpod-coverage-perl -- Checks perl module documentation for
comprehensiveness
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:16:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#166291: fixed in postgresql-autodoc 1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 178019 + fixed
Bug#178019: ITP: libtest-builder-tester-perl -- Helper testing library for
Test::Builder tests
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 160303 O: xcolorsel -- display colors and names in X
Bug#160303: ITA: xcolorsel -- display colors and names in X
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 169557 O: xcolorsel -- display colors and names in X
Bug#169557: ITA: xcolorsel -- display colors and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 169555 O: grafix -- scientific visualization library
Bug#169555: RFA: grafix -- scientific visualization library
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 169556 O: cost -- General-purpose SGML/XML post-processing tool.
Bug#169556: RFA: cost -- General-purp
Package: wnpp
This package has been orphaned.
Package: which
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 72
Maintainer: Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 2.14-4
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1)
Pre-Depends: debianutils (>= 2.2.6)
Filename: pool/main/w/which/which_2.14
retitle 160303 O: xcolorsel -- display colors and names in X
retitle 169557 O: xcolorsel -- display colors and names in X
thanks
* Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-13 22:53]:
> Unless anyone else wants it, I'll take it. An actual upload may have
> to wait a little while as I've currentl
39 matches
Mail list logo