> > > In the future I'd like to add some scripts that make creating various
> > > chroots painless (call to debootstrap perhaps excluding certain
> > > packages, mount -o bind, symlinks for /etc/resolve.conf and friends,
> > > etc.) I keep a variety of chroots on my machines at home and I'd like
>
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-05
Severity: wishlist
Package name: whatsnewfm
Version : 0.6.0-2
Upstream Author : Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.cgarbs.de/whatsnewfm.en.html
License : GPL
Description : A utility to
The upstream offers a .deb for download and the source is quite well
debianized, builds cleanly (although I don't have a pbuilder to make a
real test.) It should take very few effort to get workrave into debian,
albeit it might make sense to wait for the next release which includes
system tray supp
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:47:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174340: fixed in jpeginfo 1.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 10:55:35PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-04 21:13]:
> > If the package has as many problems as you say it does, why be so
> > generous? Why not file against ftp.debian.org directly, requesting its
> > removal from the archive
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 98921 RFP: gnomesensors
Bug#98921: ITP: gnomesensors -- simple Gnome applet, show the output from
hardware health monitoring sensors
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-04 21:13]:
> If the package has as many problems as you say it does, why be so
> generous? Why not file against ftp.debian.org directly, requesting its
> removal from the archive? As you say, Debian doesn't need hundreds of
> webmail programs.
FWIW,
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:54:15PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Upstream ignored me since 2 years, he never implemented my fixes
> His old fashioned programming-type is out of date. IF theres a new
> upstreamversion i have to rewrite it. The only reason for me
> to make a deb was h
Hi Jay,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:46:47AM -0500, Jay Bonci wrote:
> * Package name: libkrb4-perl
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Jeff Horwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/author/JHORWITZ/Krb4-1.1/
> * License : GPL/Artistic
> Desc
> > In the future I'd like to add some scripts that make creating various
> > chroots painless (call to debootstrap perhaps excluding certain
> > packages, mount -o bind, symlinks for /etc/resolve.conf and friends,
> > etc.) I keep a variety of chroots on my machines at home and I'd like
> > to ma
Hi,
I'm in the process of uploading packages and sources for
libdebbug-java and debbuggtk to http://www.tildemh.com/tmp/debbuggtk
I'd love to hear any suggestions you have.
I'm just emailing the itp and people who showed interest at the moment;
don't want to add too much junk to the mailing list
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 117995 + fixed
Bug#117995: RFA: dvb -- Transmission of digital TV and Data over satellite
transponders or cable connections
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
> In the future I'd like to add some scripts that make creating various
> chroots painless (call to debootstrap perhaps excluding certain
> packages, mount -o bind, symlinks for /etc/resolve.conf and friends,
> etc.) I keep a variety of chroots on my machines at home and I'd like
> to make it sim
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:18:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#134645: fixed in vdr 1.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:18:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#134645: fixed in vdr 1.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-04
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libkrb5-perl
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Jeff Horwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://search.cpan.org/author/JHORWITZ/Krb5-1.2/
License : GPL/Artistic
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-04
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libkrb4-perl
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Jeff Horwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/author/JHORWITZ/Krb4-1.
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-04
Severity: normal
Upstream ignored me since 2 years, he never implemented my fixes
His old fashioned programming-type is out of date. IF theres a new
upstreamversion i have to rewrite it. The only reason for me
to make a deb was his wap suppor
Package: wnpp
Version: 0.2-1; reported 2003-01-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gtkbiblevariants
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Victor Porton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://clean-bible.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : View variant reading
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 21:10:02 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#90515: Your ITP of mod-log-spread (#90515)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
20 matches
Mail list logo
