Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dmidecode
Version : 1.7
Upstream Author : Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/alan/Software/System/DMI/
* License : GPL
Description
Hi...
I already package these, see ttf-freefont.
=)
Peter
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 04:39 am, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key fingerprint:
C746 38A9 D3E4 A171 FB6A 56D4 5E30 DFCC BE11 F437
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zope-cmfplone
Version : 1.0beta3
Upstream Author : Alan Runyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/plone/CMFPlone1
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Adam Byrtek wrote:
> Since 4.5.55 (Debian last release) MANY things happened. First of all
> support for gmc (which is now replaced by nautilus) was depreciated -
Great. I everytime wondered what this stupic explorer like stuff would
have to do with mc ...
> so the gnome cod
Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:42:58 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libxmltv-perl_0.5.2-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:44:53 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libsort-versions-perl_1.4-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:40:43 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line liblingua-preferred-perl_0.2.1-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pyme
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen
* URL : http://quux.org/devel/pyme
* License : GPL
Description : Python interface to GPGME
I'm writing this; to
Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:40:03 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line liblingua-en-numbers-ordinate-perl_0.01-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:41:27 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line liblog-tracemessages-perl_1.0-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:42:07 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libterm-progressbar-perl_2.01-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:43:51 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libtk-tablematrix-perl_0.9-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 07:39:17PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-19
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: xfonts-freefont
> Version : 2002.10.11
> Upstream Author : Primoz Peterlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://s
Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:15:12 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Cancel ITP
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Excuse me, the correct lines are:
deb http://conetontli.iztacala.unam.mx/~gwolf/apt/ unstable main
deb-src http://conetontli.iztacala.unam.mx/~gwolf/apt/ unstable main
Greetings
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-1118
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, [iso-8859-15] Loïc Le Guyader wrote:
> I've just finished packaging proxytunnel and I'm looking for people to
> test and check my package and also for a sponsor to upload it.
> The package is avalaible at:
> http://l.leguyader.free.fr/depot/proxytunnel/
What's this file doing
close 138884
thanks
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:25:35 +0200
> "AZ" == Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AZ>
AZ> Browsing wnpp packages I saw this ITP.
AZ>
AZ> The fonts of Valek Fillipov have been already packaged in the package
AZ> scalable-cyrfonts. May I close this bug?
sure
--
Hi,
I am in my new-mantainer process, and I packaged Tutos - You can meanwhile
get it at my unofficial apt repository:
deb http://coneetontli.iztacala.unam.mx/~gwolf/apt/ unstable main
deb-src http://coneetontli.iztacala.unam.mx/~gwolf/apt/ unstable main
There is a couple of pending issues regar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 138884
Bug#138884: ITP: urw-fonts-cyr -- URW fonts with added cyrillic glyphs
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Are you sure RedHat8 uses these fonts? When I installed the RedHat
beta, they were using the luxi series of fonts from B&H, which are not
DFSG compliant.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 07:39:17PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-19
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xfonts-freefont
Version : 2002.10.11
Upstream Author : Primoz Peterlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/freefont/
* License : GPL-2
Description :
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:14:16PM +0100, Adam Byrtek wrote:
AB> Package: wnpp
AB> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-19
AB> Severity: wishlist
AB>
AB> * Package name: mc-cvs
I second that mc-snapshot is more appropriate package name.
AB> Description : development version of
Le mar 19/11/2002 à 16:14, Adam Byrtek a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-19
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: mc-cvs
Could you please call it mc-snapshot ?
This package has nothing to do with cvs, and this can be confusing,
especially when grepping thro
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mc-cvs
Version : 2002-11-06-20
Upstream Author : mc team
* URL : http://www.ibiblio.org/mc/
* License : GPL
Description : development version of midnight commander
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-19
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the ipolish package.
The package description is:
This is the polish dictionary, to be used with the ispell program,
version 3.1.04 and following. The dictionary contains roughly
140,000 roots, whic
Hi!
Browsing wnpp packages I saw this ITP.
The fonts of Valek Fillipov have been already packaged in the package
scalable-cyrfonts. May I close this bug?
Anton Zinoviev
Hello,
I've just finished packaging proxytunnel and I'm looking for people to
test and check my package and also for a sponsor to upload it.
The package is avalaible at:
http://l.leguyader.free.fr/depot/proxytunnel/
Thanks.
--
Pixar Animation Studios: Reality is not our business.
Pixar's "Toy St
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-mcmcpack
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Authors: Andrew D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kevin M. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://scythe.wustl.edu/mcmc
Hola
En http://www.fotodigital-printservice.com queremos cumplir con la nueva Ley de
Servicios de la Sociedad de la Información (LSSI), que ha entrado en vigor el
pasado sábado 12 de Octubre. Por eso te pedimos que nos autorices a enviarte
información sobre nuestro servicio de revelado de
Hi!
You have submitted your ITA more than a year ago. Are you still going to
package it? It would be useful if someone would do it, so if you are not
going to, then I am willing to.
If you do not reply in a week I will package it on my own, and upload,
setting up it for another week delay.
Pleas
Hi,
When I felt the form, i might have miss something... Moreover I broke my
firewall so I never receive your answers. I finally found two on Debian
archives :-)
Now my smtp server works again. So, let's try again:
Package name: libemf
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Allen Barnet
31 matches
Mail list logo
