Bug#137915: Renamed to 'pm-base'

Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > I like '-base', though, because this package is a dependency > of apmd (and later, perhaps, of acpid) and contains > /etc/modutils/apm. Later the package might create a new > group for power management --- that sort of thing. > BTW, why is

Bug#138206: ITP: googlizer -- utility to search Google via your Gnome panel

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-13 Severity: wishlist Package name: googlizer Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/googlizer/ License : GPL Description : utility

Bug#121205: amavis

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:16:03AM +, Graeme Mathieson wrote: > > arc isn't available in Debian because of a non-free license. > > Ditto for freeze, which doesn't appear to have a license of any sort. hmmm.. freeze doesn't seem to be used in my version... > The reason I've been hanging back

Bug#123478: marked as done (ITA: sslwrap -- Simple TCP service encryption using TLS/SSL)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:32:13 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#123478: fixed in sslwrap 2.0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: Change it please

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 135129 ITA: gnome-network -- The gnome network utilities. Bug#135129: RFA: gnome-network -- The gnome network utilities. Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Processed: Change It

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 135129 - RFA Unknown tag/s: RFA. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending. Bug#135129: RFA: gnome-network -- The gnome network utilities. Tags removed: > tags 135129 + ITA Unkno

Bug#138190: RFP: mozilla-enigmail -- enigmail - gpg-extension for mozilla

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-13 Severity: wishlist * Package name: mozilla-enigmail Version : 0.2.8.1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download.html * License : GPL Description : enigmail - gpg-extensi

Bug#138151: ITP: effectv -- real-time video effector

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-14 Severity: wishlist * Package name: effectv Version : 0.3.4 Upstream Author : FUKUCHI Kentarou et al. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://effectv.sourceforge.net/index.html * License : GPLv2 Description : rea

Bug#137915: Renamed to 'pm-base'

On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 03:34, Chris Halls wrote: > powermgmt-utils? Hmm. Not bad. I like '-base', though, because this package is a dependency of apmd (and later, perhaps, of acpid) and contains /etc/modutils/apm. Later the package might create a new group for power management --- that sort of t

Bug#97686: ITP: acl -- ext2 Access Control Lists suite

hi Dominik, On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:43:00AM +0100, Dominik Kubla wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:56:30PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > > i'm writing regarding your intention to package acl patches and program > > suite. i see it is pretty dated. > > > > please let me know if you a

Bug#121205: amavis

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:05:31PM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote: > On Die, 12 Mär 2002, Brian May wrote: > > > What work (if any) has been done in the way of packaging amavis for > > Debian? Very little. I'm suffering from a lack of free time just now... > arc isn't available in Debian because of a

Bug#121205: amavis

On Die, 12 Mär 2002, Brian May wrote: Hello, > What work (if any) has been done in the way of packaging amavis for > Debian? I build a package but didn't upload it. arc isn't available in Debian because of a non-free license. I wanted to build a virusscaner wget script, so the installation would

Bug#137915: Renamed to 'pm-base'

Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > Is "powermanagement-base" not an option? > > If it's a package that normal users won't install directly, > > it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish. > > Can you come up with a shorter suggestion? My suggest

Bug#137915: Renamed to 'pm-base'

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:20:03AM -0500, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Is "powermanagement-base" not an option? > > If it's a package that normal users won't install directly, > > it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish. >

Bug#138121: ITP: kernel-patch-lpp -- Display a graphical boot-screen with progress

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist This package is going to replace kernel-patch-lpp-640x480 and kernel-patch-lpp-1024x768, as it provides a way to choose the resolution through make [x|menu]config. Which architectures provide framebuffer drivers? According to linux/drivers/video/Config.in the

Bug#133513: KISMET packages.

Francois, How is your packaging of kismet going? I had a need to package it for use here and have uploaded my packages to http://people.debian.org/~msp/. I am happy to honour your ITP and allow you to upload your packages to the main Debian archive. However if you no longer want to progress t

Bug#138113: ITP: amap - Network scanner that probes for protocols

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Hi, I intend to package amap, a network scanner that takes the results from an nmap scan (or a simple hostname/port combination) and then probes the specified port to see what protocols are running there (ignoring the port number). License is GPL, Download page i