Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
I plan on adopting the ill maintained screen package. It currently has
~50 open bugs, many of which are fixed by the new upstream version
(3.9.8) which has been out since September of 2000.
I emailed the mai
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I intend to package Crimson Fields, a hex-based and round-based tactical
game similar to Battle Isle (tm). There's no AI opponent (yet?), so you
can only play it in 'hot seat'-mode or via email..
License: GPL
Homepage: http://www.lanipage.de/jens/
Download: http:/
>I think getting ardour into Sid could benefit the project in the sense that it
>opens the code to a larger audience and speed up tracking bugs (after all,
>that's all about what Open Source is).
at this time, i sincerely doubt that. the CVS log for the last 2 days
records 2000+ lines of changed
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-05-04
Severity: wishlist
licence: GPL
homepage: http://guitartex.sourceforge.net
GuitarTeX is a program used to create .dvi or .ps guitar (or bass)
tabulature or lyrics with chords. It can also transpose the chords
(but the transposing does not care abou
On Thu, 3 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, you can hand it to me.
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
cu
Adrian
--
Ni
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:57:01PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >I'd like to package those 2 programs for the Debian distribution and want to
> >b
> >e sure you agree on that. Also have you heard of any unofficial packages
> >done
> >?
>
> people have done them. i don't want them done at this tim
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:46:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I was about posting an ITA xabacus. Scrolling thru BTS, I saw :
> >
> > - Adrian Bunk temporarily adopted xabacus (bug#84746).
> >
> > - IIUC, Ingo Rohlfs wanted to adopt the package a
Apparently author isn't very inclined at getting his code packaged ...
- Forwarded message from Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ardour & quasimodo debian packages
From: Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I'd like to package
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2001 14:59:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#84533: fixed in kdestudio 2.0.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 05:44:09AM +0200, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
>
> > I was about beginning to package bcast-2000c when I saw you posted an
> > ITP to Debian BTS. It was posted 171 (135) ago though. Are you still
> > willing to work on this ?
>
>
De ce que je vois tu parles français, non ? Bon, au cas où, je continue en
anglais.
Apparently there are 2 persons who posted ITP's and efforts are forked : Samuel
Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Guenter Geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Did you get
in
touch with each other ?
I know people who are wai
Hi,
I was about beginning to package bcast-2000c when I saw you posted an ITP to
Debian BTS. It was posted 171 (135) ago though. Are you still willing to work
on this
?
--
Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
--- start of forwarded message ---
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 19:18:50 +0200
From: "G . Gabriele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-wnpp@lists.debian.org
Subject: nettoe looking for adoption.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-Lis
I all, I hope I'm not OT here.
http://nettoe.sourceforge.net
it's a console based tic-tac-toe game
playable over a network.
It's written in C and the last stable
version is 1.0.5
I'd really like to see it in Debian.
Let me know.
Thanks,
G.Gabriele
--
___ _ __
| | | |__
Hello Mr. Rossouw, Peter,
I'm an electrical engineer, so I got a bit interested in ViPEC. However, a
preliminar analysis shows a possible problem with the ViPEC licensing, or at
the very least a problem with how this licensing is understood by the ViPEC
developers.
The sourceforge webpage, http:/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 95687 ITP: opmake -- OpenPackages.org make
Bug#95687: ITP: opmake: OpenPackages.org make(1)
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 96140 ITP: junit -- Automated testing framework for Java
Bug#96140: ITP: junit - Automated testing framework for Java
Chang
16 matches
Mail list logo
