Re: Please run giveback of dbus-c++ (kfreebsd-amd64)

2012-05-31 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi! > >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:31:56 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: >>> gb dbus-c++_0.9.0-5 . kfreebsd-amd64 > > Done, let's see what happens Looks like the build was successful this time [1], so I su

Please run giveback of dbus-c++ on armel

2012-06-03 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi, dbus-c++ FTBFS on armel due to a timeout, whereas it builds fine on all other archs. gb dbus-c++_0.9.0-6 . armel Thanks! Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http

Please giveback conky 1.9.0-2~bpo60+1 on mips

2012-07-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask for givebacks for a backport; sorry for the noise if it's not. conky FTBFS due to an ICE not seen on any other arch, or in sid, or in the squeeze-backports version of conky-all. gb conky_1.9.0-2~bpo60+1 . mips Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: Please giveback conky 1.9.0-2~bpo60+1 on mips

2012-07-21 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask for givebacks for a > backport; sorry for the noise if it's not. > > conky FTBFS due to an ICE not seen on any other arch, or in sid, or in > the squeeze

Please giveback crawl on sparc

2013-06-09 Thread Vincent Cheng
Dear wanna-build team, Please give back crawl on sparc, reason being that it hits an ICE only on sparc, not on any other arch. Thanks! gb crawl_2:0.12.1-1 . sparc Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Please give back 0ad on amd64

2013-06-24 Thread Vincent Cheng
Dear wanna-build team, Please give back 0ad on amd64 on a buildd other than barber (i.e. retry until some other buildd takes it). Currently, it FTBFS on barber due to "Illegal instruction" when running its testsuite, and it's proving to be problematic to trace the root cause of the issue. I cannot

Re: Please give back 0ad on amd64

2013-06-25 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:19:03AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> Dear wanna-build team, >> >> Please give back 0ad on amd64 on a buildd other than barber (i.e. >> retry until some other buildd takes it). > >

Re: Please give back 0ad on amd64

2013-06-25 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:36:42AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:19:03AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> >> Dear wanna-build

Please give-back codeblocks on sparc

2014-01-16 Thread Vincent Cheng
Dear wanna-build team, Please giveback codeblocks on sparc. It builds fine on all other archs (except it's still waiting to be built on mipsel), but on sparc the latest build failed with an ICE. gb codeblocks_13.12-1 . sparc Thanks, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@l

Please giveback conky on armhf

2014-02-19 Thread Vincent Cheng
Dear wanna-build team, Please giveback conky on armhf, because the buildd that took the job was obviously drunk at the time ("Could not connect to incoming.debian.org:80 (138.16.160.12). - connect (110: Connection timed out)"). Thanks! gb conky_1.9.0-4 . armhf Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRI

Please giveback wesnoth-1.12

2014-12-14 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi wanna-build folks, It looks like the mips build for wesnoth-1.12 segfaulted very early on for no apparent reason, so I'd like to request a giveback for it. gb wesnoth-1.12_1:1.12.0-1 . mips Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

wesnoth-1.18 stuck on amd64 buildd

2024-07-03 Thread Vincent Cheng
[not subscribed to list, please keep me cc-ed] Hello, The wesnoth-1.18 package appears to be stuck in "building" state on one of the amd64 buildds for over 3 days [1]. This package should normally not take more than a hour to build. It hasn't failed yet so I'm not sure it qualifies for a give bac