On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 12:31:43AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-05-04 00:13, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > This page
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf
> >
> > makes me to believe that the Arch: all autobuilder successfully
> > The link, when it's present, is supposed to match the actual build
> > which happened for the installed binaries. If they do not match it
> > would be better not to have a link at all.
>
> We don't have any way to match the actual build with the binary in the
> archive.
So that's exactly what
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 12:47:28PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> What I find odd is, if the arch:all packages were maintainer-uploaded, why did
> the all buildd try to build them?
>
> Was it a source-only upload, the builder tried to build the arch:all packages
> and failed, then the mai
El 20/6/24 a las 1:03, Cyril Brulebois escribió:
Cc-ing the wb team for information about those huge logs. I don't have
any metrics, but that's the kind of size that seems way higher than it
should be.
Hi. Some metrics for you, from my build log collection:
-rw-r--r-- 1 master master133965
