Please give back mysql-connector-c++

Hi. mysql-connector-c++ git csught by the mysql_config ssl bug so please dw mysql-connector-c++_1.1.0-4 . armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 ia64 powerpc sparc . - m "libmysqlclient-dev (>= 5.5.23+dfsg-1)" Regards Rene -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit GMX Mail gesendet.

Re: MBF Announcement: Transition libpng12 -> libpng16

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:58:03PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:50:58PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Rene Engelhard, on Tue 05 Jan 2016 21:43:33 +0100, wrote: > > > So that it will immediately fail when something eventually picks > > > u

please gb various packages on mips* (binutils/GL breakage)

Hi, please do the following: gb fracplanet_0.4.0-5 . mips mipsel mips64el gb sonnet_5.28.0-1 . mips mipsel mips64el gb kitemmodels_5.28.0-1 . mips mipsel mips64el gb kpackage_5.28.1-1 . mips mipsel mips64el gb xorg-server_2:1.19.0-2 . mips mipsel mips64el gb mutter_3.22.2-1 . mips mipsel mips64el

Re: packages expected to fail on some archs

Hi, Am 11.09.22 um 22:07 schrieb Adrian Bunk: On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 05:08:57PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: ... The issue we see is that some DDs end up setting a hardcoded list in the "Architecture" field, rather than just letting builds keep failing on these archs (and then possibly succe

Re: unexpected riscv64 build success on buildd / NaN payload

Hi, Am 27.02.24 um 19:05 schrieb Aurelien Jarno: On 2024-02-27 10:59, René Engelhard wrote: Is rv-osuosl-05 hardware which supports this? (db.debian.org/machines.cgi doesn't really shed any light here; they all say "Hifive Unmatched"). Just running a build on my machine again, too. All risc

Re: unexpected riscv64 build success on buildd / NaN payload

Hi, Am 27.02.24 um 19:26 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Then I more wonder why it failed the test on -03 and "worked" on -05 now where the difference is just -O0 vs. -O2. I did "quick" tests (with some "shortcut" hacks to get the test ran without building everything)

gb openoffice.org 1:3.0.1-11

10:10 < _rene_> dato: #debian-release.2009-04-27:23:27 < dato> _rene_: if you read a bit of backlog, you'll be able to read that we're expecting for a workaround to be in place in the mipsen buildd during this week 10:10 < _rene_> dato: is there an

openoffice.org-voikko give-backs

Hi, please: dw openoffice.org-voikko_3.1-1 . amd64 armel mips mipsel s390 sparc . -m 'openoffice.org-dev (>= 1:3.1.0-2) gb openoffice.org-voikko_3.1-1 . amd64 armel mips mipsel s390 sparc Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Re: openoffice.org-voikko give-backs

retitle 529020 expects $HOME writable, doesn't speciffy correct -L to ../sdk/lib in settings.mk severity 529020 important reassign 529020 openoffice.org-dev close 529020 1:3.1.0-2 thanks Hi, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:12:41AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote

Re: openoffice.org-voikko give-backs

reopen 529020 found 529020 1:3.1.0-1 tag 529020 + pending thanks Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > dw openoffice.org-voikko_3.1-1 . amd64 armel mips mipsel s390 sparc . -m > > > 'openoffice.org-dev (>= 1:3.1.0-2) > > > > Is this for #529020? Please reasi

lp_solve bin-NMUs for suitesparse 3.4.0

Hi dato, *. As suitesparse 3.4.0 entered sid now and its libs get all into seperate packages now packages need bin-NMUs, so please: nmu lp-solve_5.5.0.13-5 . ALL . -m "rebuild against suitesparse 3.4.0" dw lp_solve_5.5.0.13-5+b1 . ALL - amd64 . -m 'libsuitesparse-dev (>= 1:3.4.0-1)' OOo will get

Re: lp_solve bin-NMUs for suitesparse 3.4.0

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > As suitesparse 3.4.0 entered sid now and its libs get all > into seperate packages now packages need bin-NMUs, so please: > > nmu lp-solve_5.5.0.13-5 . ALL . -m "rebuild against suitesparse 3.4.0" > dw lp_solve_5.5.0.13-5+b1 . ALL - amd64

Re: lp_solve bin-NMUs for suitesparse 3.4.0

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > As suitesparse 3.4.0 entered sid now and its libs get all > into seperate packages now packages need bin-NMUs, so please: > > nmu lp-solve_5.5.0.13-5 . ALL . -m "rebuild against suitesparse 3.4.0" > dw lp_solve_5.5.0.13-5+b1 . ALL - amd64

SuiteSparse 3.2.0->3.4.0 transition (was: Re: SuiteSparse 3.2.0->3.3.0 transition)

Hi Luk, hi *; Luk Claes wrote: > >>> The upstream authors of SuiteSparse have released version 3.3.0. If we > >>> package this version for Debian, we will have to go through another > >>> library transition since the package will be named libsuitesparse-3.3.0. [...] > binNMUs scheduled. If I am

remove Not-for-us for OOo on sparc, please

Hi, OpenOffice.org was disabled from building on sparc bebecause it (on some machine types, see below) randomly failed to build. Martin (zobel) approached me a few weeks ago and we confirmed it only fails on one type of our sparc machines and not on the other, so it got blacklisted on those "brok

please re-set dep-waits for libreoffice-voikko

Hi, dw libreoffice-voikko_3.2~rc1-1 . kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 powerpc . -m 'libreoffice-dev (>= 3.3.0-3)' Was set previously, but got deleted by the recent libreoffice-voikk upload :/, and libreoffice-dev < 3.3.0-3 makes voikko FTBFS on those archs (https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=

please requeue libreoffice-voikko (was: Re: please re-set dep-waits for libreoffice-voikko)

Hi, On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:47:37PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Was set previously, but got deleted by the recent libreoffice-voikk > > upload :/, and libreoffice-dev < 3.3.0-3 makes voikko FTBFS on those archs > > It really shouldn't clear that. There probably is a bug in that > case. It

Re: Accepted redland 1.0.13-2 (source i386)

Hi, On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:11:37PM +, Dave Beckett wrote: >* Rebuild against versioned libraptor2 (Closes: #561681, #613673, #614344) You did this upload when 2.0.0-2 of raptor2 was not yet in the archive for mips and mipsel (and you don't have a build-dep toforce a newer version eit

Re: Accepted redland 1.0.13-2 (source i386)

Hi again, On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:58:20PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:11:37PM +, Dave Beckett wrote: > >* Rebuild against versioned libraptor2 (Closes: #561681, #613673, > > #614344) > > You did this upload when 2.0.0-2 of rapto

Re: Accepted liblrdf 0.4.0-4 (source amd64)

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 03:10:38PM +, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >[ Adrian Knoth ] >* Explicitly depend on versioned libraptor. > Closes: #613675. Eh, sure? The raptor build with the fixed .shlibs (-3 fixed the versioning, -4 added the missed .shlibs bump) is not yet built on armel a

please requeue libreoffice on mips, mipsel, ia64, kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64

Hi, libreoffice FTBFSed on all gcj-using archs (while it succeeded on all archs using OpenJDK)i - see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libreoffice - , as described on http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2011/06/msg00108.html. See Vincents reply on http://lists.debian.org/debian-java

Re: please requeue libreoffice on mips, mipsel, ia64, kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64

Hi, On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 03:55:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 03:18:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > libreoffice FTBFSed on all gcj-using archs (while it succeeded > > on all archs using OpenJDK)i - see > >