Hi,
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The binNMU issue entails two “sub-problems”. The first is the one
> introduced by different entries in binNMUs on multiple architectures.
> The other is the unmatched versions for possible out-of-step binNMU
> versions.
>
> Personally I see very cle
Hi,
On Tue, 14 May 2013, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> 2013/5/14 Raphael Hertzog :
> > But ansgar's objection about the duplication of the changelog in multiple
> > .deb when it used to be shared via a symlink also makes sense. As does the
> > fact that there's currently no
Hello,
please give back gnuradio on mips... lucatelly failed to build it
because it got killed by the 300 minutes of inactivity limit. But
mips-aql-02 and mips-aql-05 built it successfully in the past.
gb gnuradio_3.7.8-2.2 . mips
FTR I filed https://bugs.debian.org/798181 in the hope that the m
Hello,
have a look at this mail about continuing to support armel/armhf
in wheezy/updates (security suite) during the LTS period.
Forwarding it here on request of Hector Oron (zumbi) as my initial mail
only had a copy to debian-arm.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> In the mean time, the sponsor clarified that they will join as "gold
> sponsor" so they are effectively sponsoring 8 hours of work per month,
> which seems to be enough to cover for the increased work that those
> ports
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here.
Thanks for making this clear. I also want to explain why I included DSA
in the discussion: I wanted to make sure that the fact that we run wheezy
armel/armhf buildd for two more years do not go against some
Hi,
thanks for the feedback.
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I think one of the contentious points is how "Freexian raising funds to
> work on Debian LTS" is already too close to calling itself "Debian LTS
> fundraising", so I'm not sure bringing them closer would alleviate
> anyone'
Hello Ansgar,
thanks for your work!
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> I'm not quite sure if uploading new packages will trigger a mirror
> push. I think that only happens when uploads to policy queues are
> processed and might need to be adapted.
I guess that if you are not able to
Hello Mike,
On Sat, 06 Jan 2018, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I like to subscribe to the `build` keyword for some of my packages,
> essentially to get notifications of build failures. The sad result is
> that because some buildds are dumb, I'm being spammed by them trying
> and failing to build over and o
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Jan 2018, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I'm putting debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org in copy to hear their thoughts
> > about this. Do you think it's possible to add headers like:
> >
> > X-Debian: buildd.debian.org
> > X-Debian-Architecture: powerpc
> > X-Debian-Suite: sid
>
Hi,
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Will you do it soon or is there a place where we should record this
> > wishlist?
> I don't mind just doing it. I just looked at the current code and it
> already sets this:
>
> msg['X-Distro-Tracker-Package'] = buildlog.package
> msg['X-Di
[ Bcc to ftpmasters, wanna-build team, DSA team, LTS team, security team
to catch their attention ]
Hello,
some of the LTS sponsors are looking to extend the support period of
Debian 7 Wheezy (from a few months up to a full year). Some of the LTS
sponsors (notably Plat'Home, Toshiba) are also m
Hello,
as members of the Debian teams that are directly impacted by the work
of the Debian LTS team, I would like to draw your attention
to a discussion that I recently started on debian-project:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2020/11/msg2.html
TLDR: we would like to give back to the
Hello,
some of you might have already heard of "debusine". It aims to be
a software factory tailored for the needs of Debian. At some point,
it might become a replacement for wanna-build and the buildd, it might
also be useful to run archive wide QA tasks (hence the two lists
debian...@lists.debia
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:06:01 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Ordered by rounds (next round cannot be started until the previous one
> > has been built everywhere):
>
> Actually, only the ones with wildcards produce broken symbols files,
> the updates l
Hi Lamont & Bastian,
both of you are running one or more buildd for Debian but they are still
using some old non-official version of sbuild. Those versions are
apparently not compatible with the new source formats that were developed
and it would be nice if your buildd could be ready for the trans
Hi,
Can someone reply to Lamont? Please keep me in copy.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 04:02:43PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> both of you are running one or more buildd for Debian but they are still
> using some old non-official version of
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:22:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Can someone reply to Lamont? Please keep me in copy.
>
> So you contacted him in private and now forward mails out of private mail
> exchanges to public locations?
Hi,
On Sun, 29 May 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > There is more than a handful of packages which do not care about
> > dpkg-buildflags yet in debian/rules. Currently it's difficult to
> > tell if a package build honors dpkg-buildflags or not. The only way
> > to do this
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Luk Claes wrote:
> Why could wb not handle the case where one tries to binNMU on one arch
> where it should be done on all archs without changing binNMU formats?
Maybe they try to tackle the "binNMU arch: all packages" problem at the
same time?
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ D
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow. Do you mean this file would only contain the
> binNMU revision changelog entry, or that it would append it to the
> source changelog and move it to that new path, or both would be
> installed alongside (or maybe something else)
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:29:00 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I have suggested that the binnmu changelog (which is a single line, or
> > could easily be constrained to a single line) should just become a new
> > control header
(Please keep me, Colin and Stefano in CC when you reply)
Hello,
a few months have elapsed since our last contact, where we tried
to gather some requirements to make debusine useful for your needs.
We acknowledge that it's hard to give feedback on early plans so this
time we're sharing something
Hello Hector,
thank you for your comments and questions!
On Wed, 09 Oct 2024, Hector Oron wrote:
> First of all that comes to mind is the chain of *dependencies* of the
> software in terms of long term *maintainability*, the ease to adapt the
> code for newer needs and the ease to update and upgr
24 matches
Mail list logo
