Hi,
During the build of ucommon on mipsel the test suite was aborted [1].
Since the previous version built fine on mipsel and the new version
changes only the arch all build, this is likely a transient failure.
gb ucommon_7.0.0-9 . mipsel
Thanks,
Peter
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetc
Hi,
During the build of julia on i386 the test suite was aborted [1].
Since the previous version built fine on i386 and the new version
changes only parallel=1 builds, this is likely a transient failure.
gb julia_0.4.7-2 . i386
Thanks,
Peter
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=j
Hi,
During the build of julia on i386 the test suite was aborted [1].
Since the previous version built fine on i386 and the new version
is merely a cosmetic change, this is likely a transient failure.
gb julia_0.4.7-4 . i386
Thanks,
Peter
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=juli
Hi,
The build of fuzzel on some non-x86 archs failed due to false-positive
errors [1] by gcc-14_14.2.0-3, e.g., on mips64el. I would like to retry
the build to see if the errors are reproducible using gcc-14_14.2.0-7.
gb fuzzel_1.11.1+ds-1 . mips64el
Thanks,
Peter
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cg
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 02:29:29PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> The issue may be worked around by simplifying the code, e.g.,
>
> --- a/match.c
> +++ b/match.c
> @@ -1477,18 +1477,19 @@ matches_update_internal(struct matches *matches, bool
> incremental)
>
>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:24:03PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 21/10/2024 15:24, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The build of fuzzel on some non-x86 archs failed due to false-positive
> > errors [1] by gcc-14_14.2.0-3, e.g., on mips64el. I would lik
