Re: package-arch-specific missing on security-master?

On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:08:41PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 12747 March 1977, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > if I recall correctly, there used to be a file which listed packages > > which are architecture-specific despite being nominally > > Architecture: any. This file seems to be missing o

Re: package-arch-specific missing on security-master?

On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:26:11AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:47:38PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:08:41PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > On 12747 March 1977, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > &g

Prevent build of hostapd_0.6.10-2+squeeze1 on kfreebsd

Hi, hostapd_0.6.10-2+squeeze1 for stable-security keeps triggering failed builds on kfreebsd. Since it's Linux-specific, please mark is not buildable for kfreebsd-any. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/ makes it appear that LTS is an official Debian > > effort. > > And it is. There are multiple Debian developers who have initiated this > project, have been organizing it on debian-...@lists.debian.org

Re: wanna-build access to schedule binNMUs for Go packages

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 04:16:21PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > [+t...@security.debian.org for their okay] > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > Hector Oron pointed out in the Debian RT that

Re: Steps for Debian Jessie LTS end-of-life

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:27:38AM +0200, Ansgar wrote: > Hi, > > since LTS for Jessie has ended according to [1], can we disable uploads > and prepare for archiving the release? > > I want to: > > 1. Stop accepting anything. > 2. Have one Release with no Valid-Until for archive.d.o (to try to >

orthanc 1.10.1+dfsg-2+deb12u1 / resetting the Failed state

Hi buildd folks, the orthanc 1.10+dfsg-2+deb12u1 builds for bookworm-security were affected by https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039472 and are all in "Failed". 20230620~deb12u1 is now in bookworm-proposed-updates and the security buildds currently include p-u, could you please re

Re: orthanc 1.10.1+dfsg-2+deb12u1 / resetting the Failed state

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 08:21:40PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Hi buildd folks, > the orthanc 1.10+dfsg-2+deb12u1 builds for bookworm-security were affected by > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039472 and are all in > "Failed". > 20230620~d

Re: orthanc 1.10.1+dfsg-2+deb12u1 / resetting the Failed state

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 08:45:19PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 08:21:40PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Hi buildd folks, > > the orthanc 1.10+dfsg-2+deb12u1 builds for bookworm-security were affected > > by > > https://bugs.debia

Re: Security releases for ecosystems that use static linking

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:30:51PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > So let me ask you: are you interested in addressing the infrastructure > limitations to handle those kind of packages? and having some help for > that? Foremost this is an infrastructure limitation that needs to be resolved:

Re: Security releases for ecosystems that use static linking

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:19:15AM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > El 22/12/23 a las 09:54, Moritz Muehlenhoff escribió: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:30:51PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > > So let me ask you: are you interested in addressing the infrastructure

Re: Security releases for ecosystems that use static linking

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > [ Adding debian-dak@ to Cc ] > > One solution which has been discussed in the past is to import a full copy > > of stable towards stable-security at the beginning of each release cycle, > > but that is currently not possible

Re: Security releases for ecosystems that use static linking

Thorsten Alteholz wrote: [ Adding DSA to the CC list ] > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > One solution which has been discussed in the past is to import a full copy > > > of stable towards stable-security at the beginning of each release cycle, > > > but that is currently

Re: tunapie build in security archive

On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:21:59PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > >> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:58:11PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > >> >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > >> >>> please look into the 1.3.1-1+etch2 build on klecker. For reasons >

Give back for webkit/1.2.5-2.1 on mipsel

webkit/1.2.5-2.1 needs a giveback on mipsel to fix #598956. Apparently the build was aborted somehow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101202184249.

Re: bind9_9.6.ESV.R3+dfsg-0+lenny1_amd64.changes is NEW (stable-security)

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:30:13AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Joerg Jaspert: > > > On 12321 March 1977, Florian Weimer wrote: > Changes: bind9 (1:9.6.ESV.R3+dfsg-0+lenny1) stable-security; urgency=low > . > * v9.6-ESV-R3. Addresses CVE-2010-3613, CVE-2010-3614 > -

[bui...@fano.debian.org: Log for given-back build of asterisk_1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze1 on kfreebsd-amd64 (dist=squeeze-security)]

We keep getting such failed builds for asterisk: Apparently asterisk isn't available for Squeeze on kfreebsd. Is there a way to stop it from building asterisk on kfreebsd? Cheers, Moritz - Forwarded message from buildd on fano - X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008

Re: openafs_1.4.7.dfsg1-6+lenny4 for oldstable-security

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:13:09PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: > Am 17.02.2011 19:07, schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > We don't see it yet. > > Fixed now. We also need the symlink think, currently all buildds fail to fetch the source. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team

Re: Autobuilding for security archive currently broken

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:11:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:09:19PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > > > Somehow it seems the trigger wasn't triggered by security-master. > > > Started a database import by hand, but that doesn't resolve the > > > underlaying is

Re: Autobuilding for security archive currently broken

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 01:07:55PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Wed, 04 May 2011, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:09:19PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > > > > > Somehow it seems the trigger wasn't triggered by security-master. > > > > Started a database import b

Re: arm not building for lenny-security

On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:52:43PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Fri, June 3, 2011 17:22, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> We don't sign the build logs (anymore), the security suites are > >> autosigned. > >> I think we need the wb-admins to check this out, then. > > > autosigning is enabled only o

Please re-sign a few security builds

Hi wanna-build team, due to the key rollover a few security packages got rejected after running "dak new-security-install" on the changes file; the key was valid when the files were accepted for upload, but the key expired when the actual release happened. As discussed with Phil here are the files

Re: Bug#629952: subversion fails to build for stable(-security) on kfreebsd

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:33:34PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:45:22PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Thu, June 9, 2011 23:03, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > > > > [Thijs Kinkhorst] > > >> The last two security updates for subversion, 1.6.12dfsg-6 and > > >> 1.6.12