uploaded
linux-tools_3.12-1~exp2_i386- never uploaded
linux-tools_3.12.6-1~bpo70+1_i386 - actually for an amd64 build
linux-tools_3.13-1~exp1_i386- incomplete log
Please remove these log files. And I'm sorry to bother you with this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Nothi
linux failed to build from source on ppc64el due to a regression in
gcc-4.9 (#785066). This is fixed in gcc-4.9/4.9.2-17.
Please ensure that buildds are upgraded, then:
gb linux_4.0.2-1 . ppc64el
--
Ben Hutchings
The obvious mathematical breakthrough [to break modern encryption] would be
elk version 3.99.8-4 failed to build on i386 due to a test failure. I
can't reproduce the test failure, and all other architectures passed,
so I think it's worth retrying.
gb elk_3.99.8-4 . i386
--
Ben Hutchings
Time is nature's way of making sure that everything doesn&#
Hello,
There was a bug in gnu-efi that caused sbsigntool to FTBFS on armhf.
This has been fixed in gnu-efi 3.0.4-1. Please give back sbsigntool on
armhf.
gb sbsigntool_0.6-3.1 . armhf
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
To err is human; to really foul things up requires a computer.
signature.asc
something we
> should try to avoid - I don't think we have a precedent at all here. At
> the same time it's unreasonable to require CAP_SYS_ADMIN for a build.
The insecurity of the perf subsystem can be quickly demonstrated by
fuzzing it with Trinity or perf_fuzzer
<http://web.eece.maine.e
linux 4.8.15-1 FTBFS on ppc64el, but this appears to be due to binutils
bug #848798 which is now fixed. So, please do:
gb linux_4.8.15-1 . ppc64el
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Albert
Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 19:33 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 21/12/16 02:38, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > linux 4.8.15-1 FTBFS on ppc64el, but this appears to be due to
> > binutils
> > bug #848798 which is now fixed. So, please do:
> >
> > gb linux_4.8.15-
linux 4.9.10-1 failed to build on x86-csail-01 due to a full disk.
Please give it back to another buildd or free up more disk space there.
gb linux_4.9.10-1 . i386
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Knowledge is power. France is bacon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
linux 3.2.84-2 failed to build on x86-grnet-01 due to a full disk.
Please give it back to another buildd or free up more disk space there.
gb linux_3.2.84-2 . i386
(Same thing happened 4 days ago on another i386 buildd. But two
occurrences don't quite make a pattern.)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutc
-security
--
Ben Hutchings
The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I uploaded both linux and linux-latest to jessie-security, and linux-
latest build-depends on a package built from linux. Please schedule
another build attempt for linux-latest on armhf, if this has not
already been done.
gb linux-latest_63+deb8u7 . armhf . jessie-security
--
Ben Hutchings
The
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 11:54 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Missatge de Ben Hutchings del dia dt., 9 de juny
> 2020 a les 23:57:
> > linux is not reproducible in jessie, and the size of compressed kernel
> > images can vary slightly between build attempts. On this
oblem for getting security updates out promptly.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
~deb9u1 . armel armhf . stretch-security
--
Ben Hutchings
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education.
- Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2024-09-12 at 14:54 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:46:08AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Building linux-6.1 in the bullseye-security suite for arm64 has been
> > attempted and failed on 4 different buildds today, with the messages:
> >
The current version of ion3 is missing builds for some architectures
(ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc). Are there still auto-builders configured
for non-free on these architectures? If so, what are they waiting for?
If not, should I request removal of the outdated binaries?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
16 matches
Mail list logo
