Re: Transition rebuilds done before the new version was available

2020-07-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le lun. 27 juil. 2020 10:04:39 +0200, a ecrit: > On 26/07/2020 16:54, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le dim. 26 juil. 2020 13:02:58 +0200, a ecrit: > >> On 26/07/2020 09:52, Mattias Ellert wrote: > >>> Why are the transition binnmus not scheduled with an

Re: Transition rebuilds done before the new version was available

2020-07-27 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 26/07/2020 16:54, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le dim. 26 juil. 2020 13:02:58 +0200, a ecrit: >> On 26/07/2020 09:52, Mattias Ellert wrote: >>> Why are the transition binnmus not scheduled with an dep-wait on the >>> new soname? >> >> From my experience, that caus

Re: Transition rebuilds done before the new version was available

2020-07-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le dim. 26 juil. 2020 13:02:58 +0200, a ecrit: > On 26/07/2020 09:52, Mattias Ellert wrote: > > Why are the transition binnmus not scheduled with an dep-wait on the > > new soname? > > From my experience, that causes more harm than good. Oh? I guess that really de

Re: Transition rebuilds done before the new version was available

2020-07-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 26/07/2020 09:52, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Hi. > > There recently was a transition for a new gsoap version: > libgsoap-2.8.91 → libgsoap-2.8.104 > > While this worked as expected for the official architectures, it was > badly executed for some of the ports architectures. > > The following binn