Re: Re: If we're Going to Have Alternate Init Systems, we need to Understand Apt Dependencies

Hello, I've purposely kept out of this discussion, hoping that you all can behave in a civil manner. Obviously not. I don't rank you mail defective, there have bee several other on this list. Anyway, this whole GR is about systemd or sysvinit, and everybody pretends they don't know about alternati

Re: Re: Draft ballot

How can you issue the ballot without consensus. That is over my head.

Re: Re: If we're Going to Have Alternate Init Systems, we need to Understand Apt Dependencies

Jonathan, FYI: From a mail From Uoti Urpala: https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2019/12/msg00054.html fact: There is in practice no development of new alternative init systems happening, and no clear reason to believe that if it hypothetically did occur, there would be particular problems. Certa

Re: Re: If we're Going to Have Alternate Init Systems, let's being sensible

Changed the subject slightly. Sorry Sam, replying to this list with the previous mail does not work (evolution). Nevertheless being Swedish I don't find any offensive tone in my wording, please tell me where I failed! (As you might no know we are very honest in what we do (and write)), no hypocr

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

Hello, Please don't forget to make the number of members in the CTTE an odd number too, either by adding or removing one member. This was shortly discussed especially in: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=+636783#180 onwards and summarized in #210. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

(unfortunately this mail will probably not result in the correct thread order. Don't know if the cause is my MUA evolution, or the web interface of the debian-vote list archives) > On 2014-10-17 09:35, Hörmetjan Yiltiz wrote: > Users still cannot vote? > No. > Hello, It is well known tha

Re: Tentative summary of the amendments

Hi, This is incredible, 90+ postings are from the pro systemd people. Are you afraid of something? Where do the other side of view speak up. Seems like the same thing happening again when the default init system was chosen, the more loudly the more strength in affecting peoples opinions. Keep on,

Re: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]

> > > > ArchLinux is clearly dropping sysvinit. RHEL documentation also seems > > to imply that Sysvinit and Upstart are both dropped in 7+. > > > > Fedora actually is not that decisive, as far as I read here - > > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/243 > > It wasn't 19 months ago, but is pett

Re: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]

> Svante Signell: > > > > > And OpenSUSE also dropped support: > > > > Of course RHEL and Fedora dropped sysvinit support, they are Redhat > > derived. Can anybody guess where systemd is developed? > > > Well, OpenSUSE (and several others who h

Re: Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system coupling

Get real man. This is a very important issue in the whole free software world. Freedom of choice or not, especially for *nix*. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.deb

Re: Re: [DRAFT] Maximum term for tech ctte members

Hi, > 6.2. Composition > > 1. The Technical Committee consists of up to 8 Developers, and should >usually have at least 4 members. > 2. When there are fewer than 8 members the Technical Committee may >recommend new member(s) to the Project Leader, who may choose >