Hi,
I will most likely start the voting period tomorrow evening, so
2022-09-18 00:00 UTC.
I did not have time to put the last option on the website, but it has
enough seconds.
I welcome suggestion for the ballot texts.
Kurt
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 12:28:23PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx writes:
> >
> > > I welcome suggestion for the ballot texts.
> >
> > Tentative proposal, and the proponents
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > I welcome suggestion for the ballot texts.
>
> Tentative proposal, and the proponents of other options should jump in and
> correct these.
>
> A: "Only one installer,
Hi,
This is the draft ballot.
Voting period starts 2022-09-18 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-10-01 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting q
Vote acknowledgement are currently not being sent out. I've been looking
at it, but currently can't get it to work again. I will look at this
again in the morning.
Kurt
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 02:34:14AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Vote acknowledgement are currently not being sent out. I've been looking
> at it, but currently can't get it to work again. I will look at this
> again in the morning.
All the acknowledgement are sent out now.
Kurt
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 12:51:48AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any plan to support cv25519 key on devotee?
>
> Or could devotee send unencrypted ack to the voter? I really don't
> mind the vote secrecy... But I want to see my vote hash. I see dvt-ack
> has something like Encry
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:27:56PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 07:22:38AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 12:51:48AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there any plan to support cv25519 key on de
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 07:22:38AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> As far as I understand of what is going wrong is that gnupg tries to
> write to the status fd, but libgnupg-interface-perl is trying to read
> gnupg's stdout and they just deadlock.
So I applied this patch and th
Hi,
This is the schedule for the DPL election:
Nomination period: Saturday 2023-03-04 Friday 2023-03-10
Campaigning period: Saturday 2023-03-11 Friday 2023-03-31
Voting period: Saturday 2023-04-01 Friday 2023-04-14
Kurt
Here is the draft ballot.
Voting period starts 2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2023-04-14 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting quest
Hi,
It seems something broke devotee, as usual. I've stopped the
processing of the mails, it will not send any reply. But you
can send your vote and it will be processed later.
Kurt
On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 02:38:06AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems something broke devotee, as usual. I've stopped the
> processing of the mails, it will not send any reply. But you
> can send your vote and it will be processed later.
The ACKs should all be sent out now.
Kurt
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 01:03:38PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Just for good measure, seconded.
This is the 5th second.
Kurt
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 12:40:58AM +0100, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> I second adding this version to the vote
I'm getting a bad signature on this.
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 00:22, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Second version, taking into account feedback. Looking for seconds at
> this point:
Maybe Santia
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:26:09PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear Debian voters,
>
> While Debian has stakes in the CRA, and should issue a statement if
> only to show we exists, I am quite sure that a GR is not necessary for Debian
> to issue such statement, and I am quite unconvinced the GR
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 11:21:47PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Second version, taking into account feedback. Looking for seconds at
> this point:
So I'm still only counting 4 seconds at this point.
Kurt
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:16:48PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hello, I hereby welcome seconds for adding this text to 2023/vote_002
> as a separate proposal.
I'm currently counting 3 seconds for this.
Kurt
Hi,
I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which
the current status.
We're at the maximum discussion period of 3 weeks, so the vote will
probably start the 10th of December.
Kurt
Can people make suggestions for the ballot options text?
Kurt
On November 30, 2023 12:39:38 AM GMT+03:00, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which
>the current status.
>
>We're at the maximum discussion pe
Kurt
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:43:09PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> May I suggest for proposal C:
> "The EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses"
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 07:19:44AM +0300, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Can people make suggestions for the bal
pped to the next line. But it
might also just be fine. There is at least some code that only checks
the first few words or something like that.
Kurt
> Am 08.12.23 um 20:40 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > The CRA and PLD will be detrimental to open source software
>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:39:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the page at https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/vote_002 which
> the current status.
Here is the draft ballot:
Voting period starts 2023-12-09 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by
Hi,
This is the schedule for the DPL election:
Nomination period: Saturday 2024-03-09 Friday 2024-03-15
Campaigning period: Saturday 2024-03-16 Friday 2024-04-05
Voting period: Saturday 2024-04-06 Friday 2024-04-19
Kurt
Here is the draft ballot:
Voting period starts 2024-04-06 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2024-04-19 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting questi
Not having fully read everything, would this be acceptable:
- The DSC contains a copy of the original signature, and the hash that was
signed. Possibly an url to the repo at that time.
- there exists some tool that can extract the information from the DSC, verify
the git signature, and that it
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:30:50AM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> I hereby withdraw this General Resolution, given:
Hi,
The 24 hour period has passed, so I now consider this withdrawn.
Kurt
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ---
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
> seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
> made to the Debian
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 09:58:09AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> from http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007#majorityreq
>4. We give priority to the timely release of Etch over sorting every
>bit out; for this reason, we will treat removal of sourceless
>firmware as a best-
Hi,
I've been thinking about this proposal for some time, and I probably
should have send this some time ago. At least some people seem to
have had simular ideas, so I wonder why nobody propsed anything like
this.
The idea is to create a new section that contains files like
firmware images and F
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 03:34:29PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > The idea is to create a new section that contains files like
> > firmware images and FPGA data that gets written to the hardware
> > to make it fully functional. It is
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 07:02:27PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Kurt Roeckx]
> > The idea is to create a new section that contains files like firmware
> > images and FPGA data that gets written to the hardware to make it
> > fully functional. It is not meant for
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:15:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> While I think it would be reasonable to include sourceless firmware on our
> CDs and DVDs, I don't think this is actually a very good solution to the
> problem we face:
>
> - if they're included on the official "Debian" images, t
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:16:47PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 07:02:27PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > [Kurt Roeckx]
> > > The idea is to create a new section that contains files like firmware
> > > images and FPGA data that gets w
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:55:55AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself for the forthcoming DPL elections.
Your nomination has been received and is valid.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> > which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> > list.
>
> Can't women nomin
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> > > wr
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:36:04PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The nomination period for the DPL election is almost over. If you
> >want to nominate yourself as canidate you need to send a signed
> >mail to
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 01:19:27PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project
Secretary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The nomination period has ended and we're now in the campaigning
> period. We have 2 candidates:
>
> - Stefano Zacchiroli
> - Steve McIntyre <93...@debi
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:03:08PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> As Luk says, tackling these one at a time is probably best. So, first up
> is (bullets numbered so that I can refer to them):
>
> On Mon Mar 02 00:23, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > Overriding vs Amending vs 'Position statement'
> >
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:07:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Matthew Johnson writes:
>
> > As Luk says, tackling these one at a time is probably best. So, first up
> > is (bullets numbered so that I can refer to them):
>
> >> Positions (in no particular order):
> >>
> >> 1 The supermajority
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 09:45:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:07:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> 6 Anything which overrides a Foundation Document modifies it to contain
> >>that expecific exception a
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:00:10PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > But these do not seem like a position statement to me:
> > - Allow Lenny to release with firmware blobs
> > - Allow Lenny to release with known DFSG violations
> >
> > I
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 08:13:05PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 07:43:45PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I have no problem with considering the following to be position
> > statements:
> > - Firmware blobs are not a DFSG violation
> > - All
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:52:33PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> The point is, language isn't math, and as a result the same
> text will often mean one thing to one person, and something entirely
> else to another.
Which is my point. And people do have different opinions about
it. So you no
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:50:45AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I respectfully submit this general resolution proposal to your consideration.
Please make clear what is part of the proposal and what is not.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debi
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> PROPOSAL START
>
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> t
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de>
> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> [...]
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
> > General Resolutions are an im
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:35:32PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 15:49 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
>
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Pr
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:27:22PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [second try, this with mutt instead of tin]
> In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de>
> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> [...]
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:56:20PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:31:01PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> MJ Ray writes:
>
> > I hope that others will support this debian and co-op view.
>
> I continue to object to this GR as currently worded because it is a
> stealth delegate override that doesn't clearly state its implications and
> e
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:51:37PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >
> >PROPOSAL START
> >
> >General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> >P
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is
> clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed
> changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion. I hope the Secretary
> will fi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:49:54PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 24/03/09 at 16:10 -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
> > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
> >
> > PROPOSAL START
> > =
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:25:34PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
> > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
> >
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:26:20PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am hereby proposing the amendment below to the general resolution
> > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
> >
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > PROPOSAL START
> > =
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Proj
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:26:59AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > &
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:52:43PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:43:16AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > AMENDMENT START
> >
> > Replace "too small" with "thought to be too small, but there is a
> > lack
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:12:45AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Hello developers,
> >
> > I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution
> > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
> >
> >
Hi,
This is a draft for the 2009 DPL election ballot.
==
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Sunday, March 29th, 2009
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, April 11th, 2009
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see th
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:49:57AM +0300, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> 2009/3/19 Bill Allombert :
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > I respectfully submit this general resolution proposal to your
> > consideration.
> >
> > Asking for seconds.
> >
> > - - - - - - -
> > General Resolution made in accordance w
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:09:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > > Project. [...]
> > I reali
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:01:38AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
> can you please report on issue in the voting software that prevented
> some ballots to be processed? I sent my vote twince on April 9 and April
> 11 and got the following answer back:
Hi Luigi,
I wish you contacted m
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:46:54AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
>
> Il giorno 13/apr/09, alle ore 01:43, Kurt Roeckx ha scritto:
>> I wish you contacted me about this before so that we could find a
>> solution to get your vote counted.
>
> Thanks for your report. I di
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:23:56PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Would it be possible to add a pointer to the frequently encountered
> problems to the devotee error reply? This would most likely reduce the
> burden on the secretary during the voting period and allow people to
> solve the problems a
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:29:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I was thinking of setting up a FAQ.
>
> .oO( Why not a Debian package?, then you would gain BTS support, and
> maybe people can help with so
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:52:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Charles Plessy wrote:
>>
>> There were discussions started on the supermajority requirement, that
>> unfortunately were unconclusive (20090302002303.gm29...@matthew.ath.cx),
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2009/03/msg3.html
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:43:56PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> For instance, it would be very useful to know whether the current
> secretary would consider Peter's proposal on firmware to require super
> majority or not. If the secretary does _not_ think it will imply
> supermajority, it
Please sign your message if you want to propose a GR.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:38:25PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:42:29PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> Roeckx wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself for the forthcoming DPL elections.
> Platform will follow according to the schedule suggested by
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:13:13AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Well, if nobody but Zack is going to run, that would make for a rather
> dull and boring DPL election period. So I'll run, too.
Your nomination has been received and is valid.
Kurt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:02:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I will run as well.
Your nomination has been received and is valid.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: ht
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:05:03PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I've been thinking a lot about this, and I consider that I could try to
> improve Debian from the role of DPL.
>
> I hereby nominate myself for DPL.
I can only find the key CB27020A4D0F68ED63CFF1CC940B94C75B48FFAE
for you in l
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:30:31PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself for DPL.
Your nomination has been received and is valid.
Kurt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:55:38PM +0700, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I wonder if the questions period of the DPL elections would be more
> > productive if platforms were published beforehand?
>
> FWIW, my platform is ready, if someone
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project
Secretary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're now a few days into the campaigning period. The candidates
> are:
> - Stefano Zacchiroli
> - Wouter Verhelst
> - Charles Plessy
> - Margarita Manterola
>
>
I think that one of issues we have is that there is alot of work
to be done by some teams, some of them even regularaly mail that
they need more members, but they seem to have a hard time keeping
the numbers up, burning the other team members out.
What are your ideas to make sure those teams keep
Hi,
All the rebuttals have been added to the platforms now, but
they're not yet available on all the mirrors.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20
The unofficial results are at:
http://master.debian.org/~secretary/leader2010/
The winner is Stefano Zacchiroli.
There were some problems with the automaticly generated mail that
should have been send to the list. You'll also notice that the
graph has some issues. I will look at fixing this tom
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:04:32PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>
> Wholeheartly seconed, for all the longstanding website translators.
This isn't signed with a key in the keyring.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 07:42:58PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
>
> I second this proposal.
This message was signed with a key not in the keyring.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:26:59AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > If we go for DDs without upload rights, I think that we should be
> > extremely careful about not transforming this new kind of DDs into
> > second-class members
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:13:12PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
> > To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
> > inc
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:08:50PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:40:09PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > I'll let the patch linger for a couple of days -- actually, I'll be away
> > > for most part of tomorrow -- and then I'll ap
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:45:52AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:48:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > > I like that a lot more than the other wording, thus seconded.
>
> > Please don't go and make this more confusing for
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > My question was basicly if you wanted to make that change
> > at that time. My interpretation is that you didn't propose
> > to change it at that time, but that you would do it at some
> > later time.
> >
> > The question was
Hi,
We'll need to elect a DPL soon. The current plan for the
timeline is:
Nomination: Saturday March 5, 00:00 - Friday March 11, 23:59
Campaigning: Saturday March 12, 00:00 - Friday April 1, 23:59
Voting: Saturday April 2, 00:00 - Friday April 15, 23:59
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 04:29:41PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate myself for the forthcoming DPL elections.
Your nomination has been received and is valid.
Kurt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project
Secretary wrote:
>
> The platform will be made available when it's ready at:
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2011/vote_001
>
> I expect it to be there on monday.
It's available now, atleast on
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 10:30:04AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> So, it's that time again.
>
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:33:55PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> Roeckx wrote:
> [request for nominations]
>
> I hereby nominate myself as a prospective DPL.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:17:42PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself as a prospective DPL.
Your nomination has been received and is valid.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 11:26:55AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:33:55PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> Roeckx wrote:
> > Please make sure that nominations are sent to (or cc:'d to)
> > debian-vote, and are cryptographically signed.
Hi,
As your platfrom indicates, you have disappeared from the Debian
project before. Some DPLs started with alot of energy, but somewhat
faded during their term and then disappeared. Do you think there
is a chance of this happening to you?
Kurt
PS: I commited the platform some time ago, it ta
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2012.
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Sunday, April 1st, 2012
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, April 14th, 2012
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constituti
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:32:03AM +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Q: What will be the procedure for maintaining/updating the statement,
> once voted?
> A: The gist of the statement will be fixed by the GR. But in order to
> avoid needing a vote for every minor tweak, language improvements can be
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:21:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I hope that our constitution has the answer to that question. If a GR needed
> self-locking dispositions, that would go against the idea of having a
> constitution at all. My personal opinion is that for things that
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:17:45AM +0200, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> I think I'm late but...
As long as nobody called for the vote, I don't see a problem
adding more seconds.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:32:41PM +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
>
> TEXT TO BE VOTED STARTS HERE
>
> The Debian Project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone.
>
> No matter how you identify yourself or how others perceive you: we
> welcome you. We welcome contributions from
201 - 300 of 570 matches
Mail list logo
