On Fri, Feb 9, 2007 at 17:17:10 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > * security (I _really_ think it's nonsense, as it's not less secure
> > than the usual DD's uploads, which I tried to prove) ;
>
> Maybe "security" in this con
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 18:03:19 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Most of the candidates have responded to my requests for scheduling
> information, but:
>
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I guess this should be <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 4, 2007 at 23:41:26 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Bill Allombert schrieb:
> > Questions raised in the discussion period that are relevant to the GR.
> [...]
> > Q) We should only allow source-only upload!
> >
> > A) This is orthogonal to this GR. If developers are not allowed to do
On Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 00:22:55 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Unfortunately the FTP-masters could not not block uploads only from the DDs
> doing the mass uploads, but instead had to block all excluding a few. This
> had an unfortunate effect on e.g. experimental builds.
>
I'm not sure why you say
On Thu, Mar 8, 2007 at 00:53:33 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I took this as the approval of the fact that you (Sam Hocevar) created
> this site.
It looks like you didn't read Sam's answers in this thread. See for
example <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 15:58:00 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:48:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > IANADD, so I don't have vote right, but I'd like to ask a question
> > anyway.
>
> > To all candidates who wish to respond:
>
> > How did you vote for
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 22:51:04 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:03:22 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > and once Anthony has
> > fixed the proposal so that a DM doesn't automatically get upload rights
> > on all packages where he's currently listed as Maintainer/Uploader
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 15:49:52 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The above is the ideal situation, but if it is not possible then the
> > DM starts making sense and I will support it.
>
> You do realize that the DM proposal solves other problem
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 17:48:06 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> =
> 5.2. Appointment
>
> 1. The Project Leader is elected by the Developers.
> 2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership
>post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2007 at 15:30:34 +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I'm considering packaging ht2html [1] for Debian, mainly because the
> Jython package I'm working on uses it to build its documentation.
>
Did you mean to send this to -legal?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 20:03:57 -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> OK, the rest of your mail sounds somewhat reasonable, to an outsider who
> has no experience whatsoever with TC, but ... given that the TC often
> deals with contentious issues, and there is no obvious "right" or
> "wrong", how would y
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:14:22 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Furthermore the average skillset of the DD includes packaging while it
> doesn't necessarily include programming and maintaining a complex piece of
> software like dpkg.
>
Doesn't the average skillset of a DD include knowing not to
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
>
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5) of the
> Debian constitution:
>
> Cross-distribution standards and coop
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 00:56 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In terms of the right to vote in Debian, I'm thinking that does need
> to be earned by an obvious long-term commitment to the project. Maybe
> a minimum count of packages uploaded, or strings translated, or web
> pages written over a 1-year
Raphael,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 17:52:33 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > However, if it's seen as a "Debian" thing, instead of an external
> > thing like GSoC is, then it might lead to some resentment from the
> > side of the people that don't
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 13:34:26 -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In previous years, votes had statistical data collected in real
> time, which was then presented hourly in graphs of votes recieved and
> peoploe who had currently voted. The link to the graphs and running
> vote
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:36:18 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Hi,
> according to the original mail at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2010/10/msg4.html
> I should be able to get a fresh ballot by sending a mail to
> bal...@vote.debian.org
> with the subject
> gr_nonpackager
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 20:32:41 +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Q: What will be the procedure for maintaining/updating the statement,
> once voted?
> A: The gist of the statement will be fixed by the GR. But in order to
> avoid needing a vote for every minor tweak, language improvements can be
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 19:41:16 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:00:46PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > This seems to have stalled and I'm disappointed to see that because I
> > think this is an important issue.
> >
> > My recommendation is that you propose a
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 13:17:24 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> 2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL to
>do so are authorized to declassify excerpts of -private of historical
>interest by any process which provides sufficient opportunity for
>Debian Develo
20 matches
Mail list logo
