Re: GFDL GR, vote please!

sion, but nevertheless the problem exists in a different form -- lacking an 'exutive' summary of the discussion. Thank you for considering this, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUB

My nomination for DPL

Hi all, I hereby nominate myself for the position of Debian Project Leader for the upcoming term. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Questions for Jeroen van Wolffelaar and Andreas Schuldei

ink that was the right decision? > Why did somebody have to notice that DPL team activity reports had > stopped some time ago before anybody on the team publicly admitted > this? It happened in the beginning, but due to fixed meetings stopping, also the whole pre- and post-meeting bits unfo

Re: questions for all candidates

t I don't feel other candidates will scratch, I will surely run again. Having had the feeling of what is involved for a year, I think I already now can say that I won't just give up and drop out. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 3

Re: question for all candidates

ian.org/intro/organization [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00679.html -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Questions about Ubuntu

in Debian. At least the latter thing definitely seems to be the root for the whole "What should Derivates^WUbuntu do with the Maintainer field" issue. I think we should be confident in our own distribution. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber &

Re: Questions for all candidates: role models

is alive and kicking, and still doing great things; - by making sure that Debian people are much more aware of all the nice little projects and things happening inside Debian; - and last but not least, by helping innovative things to actually happen by increasing productivity and via that crea

Re: Question for all candidates

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ? Communication, communication, communication. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://J

Re: Questions for all candidates: role models part two

avoid being a hypocrite? About this important: || --Jeroen [1] Scud launches involve flames and are used in wars, hence the 'try to'. The name was an accident, sorry :) -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http:

Re: Question for all candidates about their Plattform pages

tform. The tags are only an aide, and are not critical (c.f. my only sin with my platform, I used , which doesn't exist -- and that you fixed to after noticing that and informing me). While I like being a perfectionist in a lot of areas, it's undoable to be one in avery aspect, so one n

Re: Questions for candidate Jeroen van Wolffelaar

that are not broken. Of course as ftp-master team member, I will keep following this and helping where help is requested, but that has not much to do with myself as potential DPL or as current DPL team member. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What if you are not elected as DPL?

elected. Which is quite logical, because I've only put things I want to persue *as DPL* in my platform. I'm not running for DPL to have a vote on my other Debian work, I'll keep doing that regardless -- things like QA, ftp-master team tasks, and of course packaging, and a load of oth

Re: Question to all candidates about stable point releases

a DPL should not want to micro-manage. It's not something I see as a priority to improve though, I don't think the current situation is unaccepteable or so. Our real releases are much more important. As DPL, I want to focus most of my energy on a limited amount of areas, better do a

Re: Code of conduct, question to all candidates

er with internet connection and join a Debian list]. Is this limiting freedom of speech? No, I don't think so. Does this help against a very limited amount of people frustrating productive discussions? Certainly it does. Debian lists are special purpose lists: they each have specific intentions.

Re: Question to all candidates about the NM process

if anyone feels compelled for that position, please send my a private mail). Anyway, I trust that you, the NM team, can work constructively on possible changes, with whoever is interested in it. I'll assist where requested, but not going to personally initiate much in this area as DPL or as individual. -

Re: Question for all candidates: what mistake will you _not_ make?

here where the real work gets done. Not in the position that IMHO should merely ensure the real work can be done in the best possible circumstances. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Reflections about the questions for the candidates

an answer, instead of silence -- although I did talk with you privately multiple times about the issue since. Anyway, unless you want to followup relevant for -vote, I suggest we'll continue this discussion privately over a beer or something. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROT

Re: Reflections about the questions for the candidates

re were a publicly available contact address. As I understand it, both Andreas and myself are promising to have simply leader@ pointed to the whole team. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNS

Re: Questions for all canidates

sted in my own platform. --Jeroen [1] http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/platforms/jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven - questions to DPL candidates

idable in volunteer projects like Debian. People scratch their itches, and if some itch isn't bothering anyone enough to be scratched, it'll remain. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --

Re: Candidate questions: expulsions process

e consequences of the procedure, and the negative consequences of someone remaining DD. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Question for all candidates: what mistake will you _not_ make?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:42:36AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:02:02AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:13:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > During DPL campaigning, it seems "in" for candidates t

Re: another question to all candidates about stable point releases

should gain themselves some auto-update feature if it's really predicteable to be needed numerous times during the lifetime of a package to have new data files. I don't have a particularly strong opinion on this though, but I'm a bit wary for having too many suites for users, w

Re: Questions for Jeroen van Wolffelaar and Andreas Schuldei

n a few days. I'll still allow the DPL team members to pick up things they want to pick up as far as they can do so without special privileges, as they see fit. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: question for all candidates

didn't want to bother James at all w.r.t. this question. After all, as far as I can briefly see, the last >2 week gap between keyring updates was a year ago, no updates between 25 Feb and 18 Mar 2005. Such track record is actually quite impressive. Kudos, James! --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaa

Re: Reflections about the questions for the candidates

rwarded to the whole team. In addition, I'll *actively* sollicit feedback every 3 months, and post results. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Question to all candidates about stable point releases

t be spending much DPL-time on either type of releases. I'll closely follow them, especially the etch release, and spend time on it if I think there are problems I need to give attention to. I think and hope it won't be needed, the people in charge of the releases are very competent. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Questions for Jeroen van Wolffelaar and Andreas Schuldei

On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:41:42AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't think it'd be particularly well-recieved if someone who, after > > all, was not elected, would assume leadership. Regardless of the

Re: Questions for all candidates: plurality of mandates

question a problem? Not on itself. Bottlenecks are the responsability of a whole team. It does make sense to consider current commitments of each candidate for a given job. But this is also the responsability of the candidate to judge. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also fo

Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile

On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile? > [...] Please see the bottom of [1] for my opinion. --Jeroen [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/03/msg00211.html -- Jeroen van Wolf

Re: question for all candidates

unwilling to comply. I'd like to emphasise, as you later noted, that this was not something the DPL team wanted. Andreas discussed this within the DPL team, and I told Andreas in November very clearly that I thought it was a very bad idea. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also

Re: question for all candidates

e voters. I don't understand, identical teams or not, there would've been two candidates with a team? Are the other five candidates all fools, or running to become a figure head? If that's what you wanted to write, I strongly disagree. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL P

Announcing Jeroen's DPL team

ian.org/debian-devel-announce/1999/07/msg00014.html [2] http://www.debian.org/vote/2002/platforms/raphael [3] http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/ [4] http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ [5] http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/platforms/branden [6] http://www.debian.org/vote/2002/platforms/bdale -- J

Re: Question to all candidates: What to change?

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: > If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about > Debian to change, what would it be? Make our mailinglists an enjoyable place for technical discussions. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PRO

Re: QFAC - SPI

astructural (legal, trademarks, money, possessions), and not directly related to creating a distribution. I don't think that's a real problem. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: QFAC - interest conflicts

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:06:31PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Are there possible conflicts of interests between Debian and your "real > life" ($WORKPLACE, whatever)? No. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944

Re: To all candidates: delegation process

one when there couldn't be an agreement any other way. --Jeroen [1] Not many people know what tasks are exactly done by wanna-build maintainer, buildd maintainers, port maintainers and ftp-masters respectively, for example -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabb

Re: Question And Proposal For All Candidates

or various reasons, but was at least for me a useful experience to learn from, and has in part shaped my ideas based on which I'm running for DPL. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Q for all candidates [was Re: Question for Anthony Towns]

event. If possible, I would strip personally-identifiable information before forwarding too. > Is there a distinction to be drawn between your own email address and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I apply above rules to all mail I receive. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also f

Re: Questions for Jeroen van Wolffelaar and Andreas Schuldei

orld peace also doesn't require being DPL, and many people try, but just being secretary of the UN makes you more effective. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposal: The DFSG do not require source code for data, including firmware

ion, but also in forms that make > such modifications practical; and > > 3. supports the decision of the Release Team to require works such as > images, video, and fonts to be licensed in compliance with the DFSG without > requiring source code for these works under DFSG #2;

Re: Proposal: Recall the Project Leader

Debian. > If this DPL's best does not include revising his proposals or seeking > compromise, then it's time for a new DPL. This will get support for > more than the Dunk Tank reason. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in debian-private 2006-08 is IMHO a pretty decent attempt at l

Re: [AMENDMENT]: Release Etch now, with source-less but legal and freely licensed firmware

* and here it starts again... > > And you have again to comment on it right ? Oh, the irony. Mike Hommey: 1st mail on -vote this month. Sven Luther: 42nd mail this month on -vote. This month is barely more than 5 days old. Sven, you're flooding. Again. Please stop that. Now. --Jero

Re: Question to the candidates: inclusion of the kFreeBSD-* ports

y insane. I'd rather have a DPL that can prioritize and spend his time on what would benefit the project the most than one that'd try to do everything at the same time as good as it gets -- and running the risk of in the end not achieving much at all. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffel

Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea

is already that anyone can easily make that services useless for anybody else. And what happens to be one of the advantages of Debian? Its multi-arch support... Even for non-free. --Jeroen [1] http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=762&group_id=1 [2] http://db.debian.org/machines

Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:46:50PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:33:08PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > And what happens to be one of the advantages of Debian? Its multi-arch > > support... Even for non-free. > > Non-free does not get auto

Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:21:22PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:33:08PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Sourceforge has a compile farm[1], and Debian has numerous machines DD's > > can login too[2]. Not everybody has 11 different arches i

Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...)

nt a vote now, and no poll > to delay it. Let's vote about whether to vote or to poll. Or would it be better to organize a poll about that issue? --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar +31-30-253 4499 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

Re: Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

7; (how silly its name may sound, it is quite insightful), will be pointed to the fact they do expose women-unfriendly behaviour from time to time, without realizing it. Hope this helps, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

The new Social Contract and releasing Sarge

rg/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200404/msg03857.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200404/msg04006.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200404/msg04112.html -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl pgpTCpDzodJMg.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: The new Social Contract and releasing Sarge

On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:10:46AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 04:08:37AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > It now turns out that Anthony Towns based his sarge-ignore policy on his > > reading of the Social Contract. > > I'm insult

Re: The new Social Contract and releasing Sarge

On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:31:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:19:10PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Abiding the SC is a duty of the whole project, not just of Release > > Manager. > > So why does the whole project seem shocked

Counter-Counter-Proposal-draft: Changing constitution to define SC better

ently added, I didn't have the time to look through the whole threads at that time whether there maybe was a good reason for that, rather than solving the same issue in a different way --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl pgp4pDMZSDkws.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea

is already that anyone can easily make that services useless for anybody else. And what happens to be one of the advantages of Debian? Its multi-arch support... Even for non-free. --Jeroen [1] http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=762&group_id=1 [2] http://db.debian.org/machines

Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:46:50PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:33:08PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > And what happens to be one of the advantages of Debian? Its multi-arch > > support... Even for non-free. > > Non-free does not get auto

Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:21:22PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:33:08PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Sourceforge has a compile farm[1], and Debian has numerous machines DD's > > can login too[2]. Not everybody has 11 different arches i

Re: Draft for a non-fee poll (Was: Re: Let's vote already...)

nt a vote now, and no poll > to delay it. Let's vote about whether to vote or to poll. Or would it be better to organize a poll about that issue? --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar +31-30-253 4499 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

7; (how silly its name may sound, it is quite insightful), will be pointed to the fact they do expose women-unfriendly behaviour from time to time, without realizing it. Hope this helps, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A

The new Social Contract and releasing Sarge

rg/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200404/msg03857.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200404/msg04006.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200404/msg04112.html -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: The new Social Contract and releasing Sarge

On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:10:46AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 04:08:37AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > It now turns out that Anthony Towns based his sarge-ignore policy on his > > reading of the Social Contract. > > I'm insult

Re: The new Social Contract and releasing Sarge

On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:31:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:19:10PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Abiding the SC is a duty of the whole project, not just of Release > > Manager. > > So why does the whole project seem shocked

Counter-Counter-Proposal-draft: Changing constitution to define SC better

ently added, I didn't have the time to look through the whole threads at that time whether there maybe was a good reason for that, rather than solving the same issue in a different way --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Second Call for votes: General resolution: Sarge Release Schedule in view of GR 2004-003

how to vote? Hit reply, fill in you preferences after carefully researching them, and send). --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Second Call for votes: General resolution: Sarge Release Schedule in view of GR 2004-003

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:30:37AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:16:57PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 06:00:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > &g

Re: Second Call for votes: General resolution: Sarge Release Schedule in view of GR 2004-003

decide between the options given. > > You should have voted for Choice 7 That's wrong, voting for 7 means the voter dislikes all options, and wants either some other resolution, or no resolution. Leaving a ballot blank is a common way to say: "I'll let others decide, I don't

Re: Vote Robinson for DPL!

x27;re doing suspiciously looks like a slander campaign. Branden has as far as I can see, nowhere done any public DPL-platform like statements in this month. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSC

Call for brevity and on-topicness of discussion

to anything that happened this year on -vote [1] http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_001 [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/ -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Question to Project Scud

eference the name sucks for multiple reasons (toy story names are for releases, not for different stuff, and scud the dog isn't friendly, ...) --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Vote for the Debian Project Leader Election 2005

ng for people is necessarily a more personal affair than voting for something more abstract like a GR about the constitution. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

Re: Ballots and one way hashes

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:55:35PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:27:11AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Eh, the buyer can demand proof, the same proof a voter has to verify his > > vote is tallied: ask the secret token. Assuming md5 is a strong

Re: How to handle tie?

expand (I couldn't find a regular tarball release unfortunately) --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]