Re: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only uploads

not a good approach. The security implications of those practices should be evident to anyone. But maybe I'm optimist... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only uploads

On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 03:37:28PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > The security implications of those practices should be evident to anyone. > > This is (sorry) bullshit. Binary only uploads are _n

Re: BREAKING NEWS: Debian developers aren't trusted

rally used to enforce their own opionions and mantaining very high the level of unuseful flaming. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BREAKING NEWS: Debian developers aren't trusted

rchive and anyway could think also that some developers are not good for certain tasks because of attitude/lack of skills/lack of time/whatever. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

ages became non-free upstream recently... > > The Debian package was freed, though. > Did you have a look to FSF-related software in the last few time? Issue a 'man emacs' for instance -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:32:34PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Did you have a look to FSF-related software in the last few time? > > I normally use them, of course. > > > Issue a 'man emacs' for instance > >

Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003

SG is not an imminent concern. > > I realize that others have other prospective GRs in progress, but I > believe that it's important to bring a quick resolution to the current > situation, and would therefore like to be able to start the clock on the > discussion period ASAP.

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

r future. My idea is that firmware is an extension of the hardware and peripherals. Point. It's managed by the OS as a black box, for the same reason that any OS driver uses a piece of hardware as a black box, with or without firmware loading. And I think that none of the kernel hackers think differently. -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:13:58PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Firmware is a component of hardware. Also processors uses microcode to > > work. So, do we are wrong in calling that 'hardw

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

ty, at last. What's next step? Remove non-free support at all with a new GR? -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: Results of the Lenny release GR

A VERY BIG +1 -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

ages became non-free upstream recently... > > The Debian package was freed, though. > Did you have a look to FSF-related software in the last few time? Issue a 'man emacs' for instance -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:32:34PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Did you have a look to FSF-related software in the last few time? > > I normally use them, of course. > > > Issue a 'man emacs' for instance > >

Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003

SG is not an imminent concern. > > I realize that others have other prospective GRs in progress, but I > believe that it's important to bring a quick resolution to the current > situation, and would therefore like to be able to start the clock on the > discussion period ASAP.

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

r future. My idea is that firmware is an extension of the hardware and peripherals. Point. It's managed by the OS as a black box, for the same reason that any OS driver uses a piece of hardware as a black box, with or without firmware loading. And I think that none of the kernel hacke

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:13:58PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Firmware is a component of hardware. Also processors uses microcode to > > work. So, do we are wrong in calling that 'hardw

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

ty, at last. What's next step? Remove non-free support at all with a new GR? -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]