Anthony Towns writes:
> [...]
> Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs that can and should be made
> and helpful bits of code, or people who accom
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Anthony Towns writes:
> > > [...]
> > > Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> > > a dialogue with
Anthony Towns writes:
> That's only one question quoted there. Are you saying you think all
> of the others are unreasonable too, or just that one?
I answered this in another mail.
> I think it's reasonable, and I'd certainly like to know the
> project's position on it.
Do you really think a u
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think this is a reasonable question, and I disagree with the
> point I think you're trying to make.
>
> On the other hand, I think the questions you're talking about were
> reasonable, if a bit verbose. I hope the candidates address at least
> so
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 02 Mar 2004 13:31:19 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Do you really think a useful and productive discussion could come
> > from a candidate trying to answer this question? I don't. I woul
Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Please unsubscribe from debian-vote if you do not wish to hear
> the opinions of the candidates on politically charged issues as well
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Seems I have still not made myself clear. I am not objecting to asking
> > about the issues mentioned. I am not objecting to abybody answering
> > them.
&
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> a dialogue with people who provide criticism consisting of suggestions
> of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs that can and should be made
> and helpful bits of code,
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > [...]
> > > Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally willing to have
> > &
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's only one question quoted there. Are you saying you think all
> of the others are unreasonable too, or just that one?
I answered this in another mail.
> I think it's reasonable, and I'd certainly like to know the
> project's position on it.
Do y
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think this is a reasonable question, and I disagree with the
> point I think you're trying to make.
>
> On the other hand, I think the questions you're talking about were
> reasonable, if a bit verbose. I hope the candidates address at least
> so
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 02 Mar 2004 13:31:19 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Do you really think a useful and productive discussion could come
> > from a candidate trying to answer this question? I don't. I woul
Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Please unsubscribe from debian-vote if you do not wish to hear
> the opinions of the candidates on politically charged issues as well
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Seems I have still not made myself clear. I am not objecting to asking
> > about the issues mentioned. I am not objecting to abybody answering
> > them.
&
14 matches
Mail list logo
