Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Failed]
> Signature made Fri Jan 13 02:21:11 2006 CST using DSA key ID 330C4A75
> Good signature from "Martin F. Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>aka "Martin F. Krafft (AERAsec GmbH) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>ak
Debian Project secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:40:20 +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> [[PGP Signed Part:Failed] Signature made Fri Jan 13 02:21:11 2006
&g
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[what should be put into point releases]
> Actually I discussed this with our release managers today, since
> I was wondering if it would be sensible and feasable to include
> more progressive (as in "newer") software into stable.
> It seems to be sensib
On 2006-10-29 Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried to determine what this vote is all about. I'm not
> subscribed to either debian-vote or debian-devel so all I can
> see is that is available from the web archives. I can not
> find anything about this, so personally I think it is
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:54:58AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>After joining Debian, I decided to help out with the [2]New
>>Maintainer (NM) process. I became an Application Manager (AM) and
>>helped many people interested in Debian joi
David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Having dead applications in the queue doesn't buy anybody anything
>> afaict.
> And, in fact, that's not what I suggested.
Correct, afaict you weren't su
Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:13:05AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On question: will the debate be published at vote.debian.org?
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200303/msg00012.html
> Two more questions, when and wh
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:39:05PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
>> On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >My advice? Keep everything centralized in a
>> >debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much,
>> >***much
On 2004-04-30 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> I hereby propose that we amend the constitution to add to the
> list of foundation documents the document attached in this proposal,
> titled "Transition Guide"
[...]
I second this proposal.
Hello,
I second this proposal.
cu andreas
On 2004-05-02 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I hereby propose that we amend the constitution to add to the
> list of foundation documents the document attached in this proposal,
> titled "Transition Guide". The context dif
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:54:58AM -0800, David N. Welton wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>After joining Debian, I decided to help out with the [2]New
>>Maintainer (NM) process. I became an Application Manager (AM) and
>>helped many people interested in Debian joi
David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Having dead applications in the queue doesn't buy anybody anything
>> afaict.
> And, in fact, that's not what I suggested.
Correct, afaict you weren't su
Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:13:05AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On question: will the debate be published at vote.debian.org?
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200303/msg00012.html
> Two more questions, when and wh
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:39:05PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
>> On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >My advice? Keep everything centralized in a
>> >debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much,
>> >***much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de>
(gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
[...]
> PROPOSAL START
>
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the D
[second try, this with mutt instead of tin]
In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de>
(gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
[...]
> PROPOSAL START
>
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debi
On 2004-04-30 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> I hereby propose that we amend the constitution to add to the
> list of foundation documents the document attached in this proposal,
> titled "Transition Guide"
[...]
I second this proposal.
Hello,
I second this proposal.
cu andreas
On 2004-05-02 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I hereby propose that we amend the constitution to add to the
> list of foundation documents the document attached in this proposal,
> titled "Transition Guide". The context dif
On 2004-07-15 Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:17:14PM -0800, D. Starner wrote:
> > To become LSB compliant would involve changing half the packages in
> > Debian to achieve a result to many AMD64 developers consider inelegant;
> > furthermore, a multiarch design
On 2025-07-21 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
> - The code of conduct applies to all program messages or documentation
> texts that could be seen by a user in the normal use of a Debian
> system, as well as to anything written by a Debian developer for the
> Debian project. However, the followi
20 matches
Mail list logo
