Re: Results for Voting secrecy

2022-03-28 Thread Timo Röhling
* Christian Kastner [2022-03-28 07:54]: The latter explicitly reaffirms the status quo, the former does not. I guess this is why Holger proposed Choice 3. Yes, and this is exactly how I used Option 3 to express my preference. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭───

Re: Questions about Debian derivatives

2022-03-28 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Paul Wise (2022-03-28 04:27:48) > On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 18:05 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > Last I spoke to you, I think you also said that you don't have much > > time to work on this anymore, and that the distro census is probably > > going to die down. Is this still the status? Do

Re: Results for Voting secrecy

2022-03-28 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 07:54:25AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: > The latter explicitly reaffirms the status quo, the former does not. I > guess this is why Holger proposed Choice 3. yes. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚

Re: Results for Voting secrecy

2022-03-28 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 01:30:53PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:03 AM Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > Clearly people don't think it's identical, otherwise it would not have > > been an option, or people would have voted it equally. > > People were confused. >

Re: Results for Voting secrecy

2022-03-28 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes: >> It inadvertently weakened the constitutional protection against >> changes to the constitution. Kurt> I currently fail to see how it does. I think Felix's point is that if we had choice 1, 2 and Nota, People who preferred option 3 would vote