Re: GR Ballot Option: Allow, but do not require, secret voting

2022-03-03 Thread Judit Foglszinger
> > + At least 4K Developers have sponsored any single ballot > > option > > + which says the votes will be kept secret. I think, 4K puts the bar very high (that would require 20 people). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: GR Ballot Option: Allow, but do not require, secret voting

2022-03-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:54:40PM -0500, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:46:16PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > [...] > > > I have argued against this notion that private votes in some way > > contradicts our principles of transparency¹, but that got no replies

Amendment to GR Option 1: Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote

2022-03-03 Thread Sam Hartman
I hereby amend the ballot option I proposed using the procedure in Constitution section A.1. My understanding is that this amendment replaces my ballot option unless one of the sponsors objects. There are two changes. The first is the change to rationale I sent out yesterday. The second is to i

Re: Amendment to GR Option 1: Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote

2022-03-03 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 03 Mar 2022 at 01:54PM -07, Sam Hartman wrote: > I hereby amend the ballot option I proposed using the procedure in > Constitution section A.1. My understanding is that this amendment > replaces my ballot option unless one of the sponsors objects. Thanks. I do not object. -- Se