Re: Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification

2022-02-24 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Sam Hartman dijo [Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 05:20:49PM -0700]: > > "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr writes: > > Yes, I think 3) and 4) are much more important in hidden votes. If this is right, Sam, let me politely ask you to unbundle. Not only due to Martin's argument (the scar of "editorial changes

Re: Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification

2022-02-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Gunnar Wolf writes: > If this is right, Sam, let me politely ask you to unbundle. Not only due > to Martin's argument (the scar of "editorial changes" we all had to > endure and understand a little too late), but also to keep each of the > choices as simple and clear as possible -- and to avoid >

Re: Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification

2022-02-24 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Russ Allbery dijo [Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:17:10AM -0800]: > > Suppose no other options are present. Judit's option wins, yours is > > second, and NotA is third. A simplistic reading would mean, "merge > > Judit's proposed changes in the constitution". However, more people > > voted 3 and 4 above N

Re: Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification

2022-02-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Gunnar Wolf writes: > Right -- the voting system allows for this quite well. But it requires > twisting each of the voters' minds around a set of sometimes convoluted > changesets that might lead to fatigue. The practice of not bundling > leads to simpler texts and easier evaluation and understan