Hi.
Here's an updated proposal based on discussion so far.
The changes were the ones I said I'd make Thursday:
1) include secretary decisions in the list of decisions that can be put
on hold.
2) Attempt to address Don's concerns regarding independent verification
of the tally and verification b
Here's a diff to the rationale section:
Rationale
=
@@ -21,7 +20,7 @@ would require sufficient support in the project but would not
require
another constitutional amendment.
This proposal relies on the secretary's existing power to decide how
votes are conducted. During discussion we r
I'm generally happy with this proposed text. Just a couple of pieces of
feedback, one quite minor.
Sam Hartman writes:
> {+ identity of a developer casting a particular vote is not made+}
> {+ public, but developers will be given an option to confirm their vote
> is included in the
3 matches
Mail list logo
