Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Mathias Behrle
* Wouter Verhelst: " Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)" (Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:53:50 +0200): > aaand this should've been signed. Good morning. Applies for me as well... > > Text of the GR > > == > > > > The Debian Developers, by way of General Resolution, amen

Waiting for the voting vote to finish... :-)

2021-11-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey folks, I've got something else to talk about (firmware!!), but I'll wait until this current discussion and vote is finished before I start. Let's not overload people. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "We're the technical experts. We were hire

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Holger Levsen
I second this. On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:53:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > [...] > > > Section A > > > - > > > > > > Replace section A as per Russ' proposal, with the following changes: > > > > > > A.1.1. Strik

Re: Waiting for the voting vote to finish... :-)

2021-11-23 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Steve" == Steve McIntyre writes: Steve> Hey folks, I've got something else to talk about Steve> (firmware!!), but I'll wait until this current discussion and Steve> vote is finished before I start. Let's not overload people. would you be willing to let peb and I propose the se

Re: Waiting for the voting vote to finish... :-)

2021-11-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:49:02AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote: >> "Steve" == Steve McIntyre writes: > >Steve> Hey folks, I've got something else to talk about >Steve> (firmware!!), but I'll wait until this current discussion and >Steve> vote is finished before I start. Let's not over

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Holger Levsen writes: > I *believe* you'll find it in english/devel/constitution.wml in > g...@salsa.debian.org:webmaster-team/webwml > (*After* the GR when the change is actually going to be made please note > that there are files like english/devel/constitution.1.$x.wml...) Thank you! -- Ru

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Wouter Verhelst writes: > Since both Russ and myself seem to be having issues here, in order to > better understand the proposed changes, I have made > https://salsa.debian.org/wouter/webwml/-/blob/constitution-russ/english/devel/constitution.wml > (which is a version of the constitution with the

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Don Armstrong writes: > Because of this (and others), can I suggest that the ballot option be > specified as a wdiff to the existing constitution? Thanks to Wouter's work, here's a wdiff against the webwml of the current constitution. This diff format makes a total hash of 6.3.1 and section A,

Re: Waiting for the voting vote to finish... :-)

2021-11-23 Thread Jonathan Carter
On 2021/11/23 17:59, Steve McIntyre wrote: would you be willing to let peb and I propose the secret ballots GR? We were hoping we were in line behind Russ. > Sure, no worries. Ah, I also had one, but can wait my turn. I considered starting a thread in -project in the meantime, but I'm slight

Re: Waiting for the voting vote to finish... :-)

2021-11-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:43:27PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: >On 2021/11/23 17:59, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> > would you be willing to let peb and I propose the secret ballots GR? >> > We were hoping we were in line behind Russ. >> >> Sure, no worries. > >Ah, I also had one, but can wait my turn

Re: Waiting for the voting vote to finish... :-)

2021-11-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jonathan Carter (2021-11-23 17:43:27) > On 2021/11/23 17:59, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> would you be willing to let peb and I propose the secret ballots GR? > >> We were hoping we were in line behind Russ. > > > > Sure, no worries. > > Ah, I also had one, but can wait my turn. I considere

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1 > majority, and am seeking sponsors. This is now at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003 I did not add any of the corrections, you did not sign them, you indi

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Kurt Roeckx writes: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1 >> majority, and am seeking sponsors. > This is now at: > https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003 Thank you! > I did not add any of the

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Russ Allbery wrote on 23/11/2021 at 23:39:51+0100: > Kurt Roeckx writes: >> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > >>> I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1 >>> majority, and am seeking sponsors. > >> This is now at: >> https://www.debian.

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes: > Russ Allbery wrote on 23/11/2021 at 23:39:51+0100: >> Yes, indeed, no problem. Currently, I'm aware of only one correction > I pointed out a typo, but probably did not emphasize it clearly enough. :) >> 4. The addition of a ballot option or the change via a amen