tl;dr: I second this.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Effect of the General Resolution
>
>
> The Debian Developers, by way of General Resolution, amend the Debian
> constitution under point 4.1.2 as follows. This General Resolution
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 03:41:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Because of this (and others), can I suggest that the ballot option be
> > specified as a wdiff to the existing constitution?
> Is there a Git repository somewhere with the canonical copy of the
> constitution that I an start from? I
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 03:41:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Is there a Git repository somewhere with the canonical copy of the
> constitution that I an start from? I assume it's somewhere in the
> www.debian.org machinery, which is something I've never worked with before
> and am not sure how
I propose the following amendment. I expect Russ to not accept it, and
am looking for seconds.
Rationale
=
Much of the rationale of Russ' proposal still applies, and indeed this
amendment builds on it. However, the way the timing works is different,
on purpose.
Our voting system, which n
tl;dr: I second this.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Text of the GR
> ==
>
> The Debian Developers, by way of General Resolution, amend the Debian
> constitution under point 4.1.2 as follows. This General Resolution
> requires a 3:1 majority.
>
> S
Wouter Verhelst wrote on 22/11/2021 at 16:15:34+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 2DFC519954181296 created at
> 2021-11-22T16:15:27+0100 using RSA]]
> I propose the following amendment. I expect Russ to not accept it, and
> am looking for seconds.
>
> Rationale
> =
>
> Much of
* Wouter Verhelst: " Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)" (Mon,
22 Nov 2021 17:15:34 +0200):
> Text of the GR
> ==
>
> The Debian Developers, by way of General Resolution, amend the Debian
> constitution under point 4.1.2 as follows. This General Resolution
> requires
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:09:54AM +0100, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> Seconded.
Your message isn't signed.
Kurt
... and then I realize I *also* made a (small, but crucial) mistake:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
> Section A
> -
>
> Replace section A as per Russ' proposal, with the following changes:
>
> A.1.1. Strike the sentence "The maximum discussion peri
aaand this should've been signed. Good morning.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> ... and then I realize I *also* made a (small, but crucial) mistake:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [...]
> > Section A
> > -
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo
