Hi all,
Let me start by apologizing for taking this long to send this email. The
attentive reader will have noticed my name in Russ' original draft as
one of the people who reviewed it. When Russ sent his initial proposal,
I started drafting a large response that I lost due to a silly mistake
on m
Thank you for raising this, Wouter!
I'm not going to reply directly to the substance of this argument right
now because Wouter already knows my opinion and I think having the rest of
the project weigh in would be much more useful. Part of the goal here is
to come up with a system that's more pred
Wouter Verhelst wrote on 22/10/2021 at 19:42:13+0200:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 2DFC519954181296 created at
> 2021-10-22T19:42:07+0200 using RSA]]
> Hi all,
>
> Let me start by apologizing for taking this long to send this email. The
> attentive reader will have noticed my name in R
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 11:23 AM Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> To fully achieve what Wouter is calling for would therefore *also* require
> a constitutional change.
As a proponent of a living process, I would welcome such an
alternative on the ballot.
Russ's motivation strikes me as extremely nob
In general, I understand the reasoning for having an option for longer
discussions. However, I see risks too.
On 10/22/21 12:42 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
a vote to recall the project leader.
This is an interesting corner case. I don't think it needs a special
case under the current situatio
5 matches
Mail list logo
