Hi,
11.04.21 09:53 Kurt Roeckx:
> I think the best way to make the vote secret is that the DPL makes a
> decision. We have a process that can deal with people not agreeing
> with that decision.
Let's suppose the DPL decides the vote should be secret. Some people might
then vote based on the assu
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:27:28PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk [2021-04-11 20:53]:
>...
> > It can be hard to vote correctly in a voting system that is very
> > different from what you are used to in real life, unless you are
> > a nerd in voting systems.
> If you ask me as someone
Hi Debian Developers
Over the course of the last few days, I've received many mails regarding
the RMS GR, both on this list, on debian-private and in private. These
mails contain a wide spectrum of concerns and even ideas on how to
improve our situation, each of which come with their own set of up
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
Adrian> My suggestion would help people to make full use of their
Adrian> vote by forcing them to rank all options.
Adrian> Equal ranking is still possible, it would not remove your
Adrian> freedom to rank any number of options equally.
I'd
Hi Jonathan,
Quoting Jonathan Carter (2021-04-12 12:12:23)
> Over the course of the last few days, I've received many mails
> regarding the RMS GR, both on this list, on debian-private and in
> private. These mails contain a wide spectrum of concerns and even
> ideas on how to improve our situa
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:12:23PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
>...
> As for cancelling the vote, I see that as something that's a much more
> severe route and that I won't be imposing as DPL. For that to happen
> there would have to be significant consensus within the project that
> would have t
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:57:27PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> I've discussed with another Front Desk member about adding a question on
> our voting system in the nm templates.
>
> The idea being to make sure if people have questions, they get some
> answers, and otherwise relevant pointe
Adrian Bunk writes:
> Discussing and voting on a change to the constitution to make all votes
> secret could then be done in 1+1 weeks starting even before the current
> GR ends, followed by a secret vote on a new GR.
The 1+1 weeks would only start after a proposal was made that no longer
needs ch
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:20:37PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > Discussing and voting on a change to the constitution to make all votes
> > secret could then be done in 1+1 weeks starting even before the current
> > GR ends, followed by a secret vote on a new GR.
>
> The 1+1 week
Sam Hartman dijo [Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:12:31AM -0400]:
> I'd support revising the instructions to recommend that voters rank all
> options on the ballot.
>
> I don't support mandating it.
> If someone doesn't rank an option I'd rather accept a ballot than reject
> it.
> If someone wrote a patch
> "Gunnar" == Gunnar Wolf writes:
Gunnar> I would not like to remove the expressive option of stating
Gunnar> '-' as a synonym to "below all other options".
We are in agreement.
However, I think Adrian has made a point that there are some non-obvious
consequences if you don't fully r
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:27:28PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk [2021-04-11 20:53]:
> > I am not saying people were stupid.
> Okay, that was hyperbolic. But you have to admit that you don't seem to
> put much confidence in people's ability (or willingness) to read the
> explanations
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:27:28PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
>> * Adrian Bunk [2021-04-11 20:53]:
>> > I am not saying people were stupid.
>> Okay, that was hyperbolic. But you have to admit that you don't seem to
>> put much confidence in people's ability (or willingnes
13 matches
Mail list logo
