Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
Free Software Foundation.
seconded
And bingo, I now have a complete card! I should go get a celebratory
drink instead of continuing to affi
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-vote@lists.debian.org
stop messing around
we need another option in the GR
0. gas Stallman (use Mollies flatulence)
I had a community team just like Debian. We call it the SS
yours, Hitler
--
Debian Dictator
Hi Felix,
On 05.04.21 15:35, Felix Lechner wrote:
When a center option is likely to fail our majority requirement [1]
should I rank preferable extreme choices above FD even if I am
strictly moderately inclined?
You are making two bold assumptions here: that the options are on a
single one-di
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:15 PM Simon Richter wrote:
>
> You are making two bold assumptions here: that the options are on a
> single one-dimensional axis
I don't think I said that—nor do I believe it. My question was about
the ballot, which more or less imposes a linear ranking.
> and
Ah, Adam, sending unsolicited private email? Fuck that, you were in the
first line on my bingo card.
On 07/04/2021 22:03, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:18:03PM +0100, Martina Ferrari wrote:
And bingo, I now have a complete card! I should go get a celebratory drink
instead of
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> f9533fc1-129b-41db-822c-be8fe8e9faa6
> [1] Choice 1: Jonathan Carter
> [2] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
> [3] Choice 3: None Of The Above
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
signat
6 matches
Mail list logo
