draft explaining the GRs

2016-08-07 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, It seems that I'm getting some questions about the current votes and I think it's probably best to send an other mail explaining things. Below is a draft, I'm looking for some feedback. Hi, The recent General Resolutions resulted in some questions: Voting secrecy == It was u

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

2016-08-07 Thread Micha Lenk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, sorry for joining the discussion late. I just realized when reading the call for votes that I should have joined the discussion earlier. Am 16.07.2016 um 23:06 schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 13:17:24 -0700, Don Armstrong

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

2016-08-07 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* Micha Lenk [2016-08-07 12:59:05 +0200]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > sorry for joining the discussion late. I just realized when reading > the call for votes that I should have joined the discussion earlier. Definitely. > Am 16.07.2016 um 23:06 schrieb

Re: draft explaining the GRs

2016-08-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Kurt Roeckx , 2016-08-07, 11:59: For DPL votes we have this text in constitution secion 5.2.5: Typo: secion -> section If the first option wins Comma missing here... the GR of 2005 is repealed and replaced by this GR. If the second option wins ...and here. nothing changes and the

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

2016-08-07 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Nicolas, On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > In my opinion the only point in this General Resolution is allowing the > declassification of the early years of -private, where the mailing list was > used as a "project" mailing list rather than for discussing actu

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

2016-08-07 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* Bart Martens [2016-08-07 13:58:46 +]: > Hi Nicolas, Hi, > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > > In my opinion the only point in this General Resolution is allowing the > > declassification of the early years of -private, where the mailing list was > > use

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

2016-08-07 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > * Bart Martens [2016-08-07 13:58:46 +]: > > > Hi Nicolas, > > Hi, > > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > > > In my opinion the only point in this General Resolution is allowing the > >