Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering

Hi Ian, Having given this some more thought, I believe I've come to understand why you don't see this to be such a crazy idea as I believe it is. On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:20:05PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one > error and

Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering

Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering"): > Having given this some more thought, I believe I've come to understand > why you don't see this to be such a crazy idea as I believe it is. ... > This works for votes where the

Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering

> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: >> Do we throw said change away? We probably can't, because it's >> still a non-binding resolution, or something. Ian> In these cases, my proposal produces `FD'. >> Put otherwise, the idea of a "non-binding change to the >> constitution" se