Hi. It's not clear that my amendment with a minimal change has quite
enough support to be on the ballot.
would people be comfortable waiting a day or two more to see if we get
any more seconds and if not, then just going forward with the one ballot
option?
--Sam
For those of us that lost track, would you please restate your option? I seem
to remember liking it.
Scott K
On September 8, 2015 7:58:33 PM EDT, Sam Hartman wrote:
>Hi. It's not clear that my amendment with a minimal change has quite
>enough support to be on the ballot.
>
>
>would people be
See https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2015/09/msg00016.html
for the message to second if you choose to do that.
Rationale copied below.
As I discussed, in Andreas's resolution, I think that the strategic
voting fix introduces more problems than it serves. INstead, I propose
that we don't fix
Yes. that's the one I recalled that I liked. Seconded.
Scott K
On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 01:08:39 AM Sam Hartman wrote:
> See https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2015/09/msg00016.html
> for the message to second if you choose to do that.
> Rationale copied below.
>
>
> As I discussed
4 matches
Mail list logo
