Re: In plain English please?! Re: General resolution: Changes to the Standard Resolution Procedure

2015-09-01 Thread Simon Josefsson
Kurt Roeckx writes: > The solution to this problem is moving the majority check later > in the process, so that option B would have been dropped first. > If they did this stratigic voting in that case both options would > have been dropped. Interesting -- one thought: haven't voting systems been

Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering

2015-09-01 Thread Ian Jackson
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering"): > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:12:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > >(i) Delete most of A.6(3) (which implemented the supermajority > >by dropping options at an early stage).

Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering

2015-09-01 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mardi, 1 septembre 2015, 12.20:05 Ian Jackson a écrit : > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off- by-one error and duplicate section numbering"): > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:12:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > >(i) Delete most of A.6(3) (which implemented

Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering

2015-09-01 Thread Ian Jackson
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes ("Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering"): > Le mardi, 1 septembre 2015, 12.20:05 Ian Jackson a écrit : > > I think I intended that this should read A.6(4)(0). > > ^^^ > >

Re: In plain English please?! Re: General resolution: Changes to the Standard Resolution Procedure

2015-09-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:47:47AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes: > > > The solution to this problem is moving the majority check later > > in the process, so that option B would have been dropped first. > > If they did this stratigic voting in that case both options would >

Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering

2015-09-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [150901 13:52]: > It'd be good if you (as well as Andreas, as GR proposer) could comment > on the full series of commits in that repository, to make sure we all > agree on a constitution diff. Up to now http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/odyx/supermajor

Re: GR: Constitutional Amendment to fix an off-by-one error and duplicate section numbering

2015-09-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [150829 16:03]: > (Or I might be totally confused about the effects of all the > changes you're doing. Those are all non-obvious changes that seem > to change more than the things you want to fix.) IMHO your questions should be answered by others already, plus the c