On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:37:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There are two possibilities for such a proposal: either we keep running
> contrib/non-free like we do now but just change the domain names, or we
> actually try to eliminate them from the project. The former is a bunch of
> work (for
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:28:17PM +, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Can you elaborate on why dropping §5 is desirable for us?
I take you don't see it as desirable then :)
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zac
* Stefano Zacchiroli (z...@debian.org) [150317 08:42]:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:28:17PM +, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Can you elaborate on why dropping §5 is desirable for us?
>
> I take you don't see it as desirable then :)
Doing that will generate additional work. This might be justified b
Le 2015-03-17 07:41, martin f krafft a écrit :
also sprach Mehdi Dogguy [2015-03-17 00:46 +0100]:
programs like Outreachy. I think that we can fund 2 slots per year.
[…]
Of course, as you duly noted, this doesn't prevent us from organizing
a fun raising campaign to sponsor extra slots.
I
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:46:48AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> in addition to saying "we can now wash our hands in innocence", which
> I don't find particularily appealing?).
Maybe it is. But isn't stating "The packages in these areas are not part
of the Debian system" yet another instance of "w
also sprach Mehdi Dogguy [2015-03-17 09:56 +0100]:
> For a start, Debian can fund two slots *this* year. If we want to
> do this sustainably, we will have to make sure we have funds
> dedicated for it
Just funding the slots won't cut it, at least not if we want
a return. Outreachy, and all other
Le 2015-03-17 10:03, martin f krafft a écrit :
also sprach Mehdi Dogguy [2015-03-17 09:56 +0100]:
For a start, Debian can fund two slots *this* year. If we want to
do this sustainably, we will have to make sure we have funds
dedicated for it
Just funding the slots won't cut it, at least not i
also sprach Mehdi Dogguy [2015-03-17 11:08 +0100]:
> Why not proceeding step by step instead of trying to build up big plans
> even before we start?
We've started.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft
: :' : proud Debian developer
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck
`- Debian
Le mardi, 17 mars 2015, 14.16:09 Paul Wise a écrit :
> Add an extra component that d-i could add to sources.list when
> non-free firmware is needed, instead of adding all of non-free.
I'd very much welcome a solution along these lines: not every package in
non-free is the same kind of evil for me
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:03:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> What is your perception of DebConf and its organisation?
> If any, what changes would you like to implement?
>
The history of the DebConf team is long and varied, and has changed
quite a bit since I was involved.
(Note: backgroun
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:06:26PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:44:45PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > * Outreach. Every team complains (quite rightly!) about the lack of
> > people to do the work. Yet we seem to be rather poor at actively
> > recruiting people to
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> You seem to view dropping SC §5 as something potentially catastrophic
> from the technical side, for enterprise and large-scale deployments. But
> at the same time you acknowledge changing domain names as a way to go
> about it. Surely if we do that change the catastr
12 matches
Mail list logo
