On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:34:14PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think it would be better if ctte members did not bring disputes to the ctte
> and then vote on the resolution of that dispute. [...]
One thing I'd been pondering suggesting was that the ctte change how they
view "requests". ATM
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:42:40PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> * Do away with the Technical Committee entirely.
>
> The main questions this raises are:
>
> How would we deal with conflicts that would currently be addressed by
> the TC? Hopefully, the answers would be something like: col
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> From those who want to drop the CTTE, I'd like to know what would they
> have done to decide upon the init system for Jessie. It seems to me that
> we have tried not to use the CTTE on that dispute for several years,
> with the net result of raging flamewars and no de
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> From those who want to drop the CTTE, I'd like to know what would they
> have done to decide upon the init system for Jessie.
There were two aspects to that question: do we support non-default
init systems, and which is the def
Clint Adams wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:50:30PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Disbanding the TC would likely do more harm than good. There would be
> no way to conclude a disagreement.
I believe that there is evidence prior to 1999 that neither of
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> There's another alternative to using the CTTE, and my
Russ> understanding is that this was generally the method used prior
Russ> to the existence of the CTTE, but I'm not sure it's really any
Russ> better.
Russ> There are specific te
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 02:46:25PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>Clint Adams wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:50:30PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Disbanding the TC would likely do more harm than good. There would
> be
>> no way to conclude a disagreement.
>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:50:30PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Disbanding the TC would likely do more harm than good. There would be
>> no way to conclude a disagreement.
>>
>> I suggested this before:
>>
>> TC actions should be
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
>
> Russ> There's another alternative to using the CTTE, and my
> Russ> understanding is that this was generally the method used prior
> Russ> to the existence of the CTTE, but I'm not sure it's rea
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Doesn't that require constitutional change? The current powers as
> written make the TC a decision-making body, not a mediation body.
Not really, because it doesn't take any constitutional powers to
try to mediate.
--
Don Armstrong
Unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAAB5DwfTR_Kz1+we5HQr-8-94M+M+=o3pkygehszivmd76q...@mail.gmail.com
11 matches
Mail list logo
