Hi,
[Reading this entire thread before voting.
Clearly too late, or too early. Sorry.]
Steve Langasek wrote (24 Mar 2014 04:37:49 GMT) :
> While it's worth discussing how the code of conduct can be improved, this is
> a wholly unscientific appeal to authority. There may happen to be a group
> th
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 02:23:39PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I'd like to call for votes on the code of conduct GR.
Just a question - the CoC we are voting on is the one from
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/02/msg2.html or which one
is it? Were any of the numerous objectio
Michael Banck writes:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 02:23:39PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> I'd like to call for votes on the code of conduct GR.
> Just a question - the CoC we are voting on is the one from
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/02/msg2.html or which one
> is it? Were a
> Oh, and access to science knowledge and to the material means to do
> spend time doing research is not equally distributed either.
> When basically the same groups are historically excluded from science
Ouch, please. We are far away from the times when women were
excluded from science. Don't bri
4 matches
Mail list logo
