Thue Janus Kristensen writes ("Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and
later-no-harm"):
> I am not completely sure, but I think both ways accomplish the same thing,
> if you always only use the >= criterium.
>
> My way seems more flexible though, since you can use it with >= or >, or
> 2/3 major
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 04:50:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In my proposal, the casting voter gets to choose between A and B and
> there less incentive to manipulate the system by voting FD.
>
I'm just wondering, what was the purpose behind treating FD as a special
case in the first place? Cou
Neil McGovern writes ("Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm"):
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 04:50:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In my proposal, the casting voter gets to choose between A and B and
> > there less incentive to manipulate the system by voting FD.
>
> I'm just wond
2014-02-28 17:50 GMT+01:00 Ian Jackson :
> Thue Janus Kristensen writes ("Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and
> later-no-harm"):
> > I am not completely sure, but I think both ways accomplish the same
> thing,
> > if you always only use the >= criterium.
>
Actually, they are not identical. Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call
for seconds. I don't think further lengthy discussion of the issues is
likely to be productive, and therefore hope we can bring this swiftly
to a vote so that the project can st
5 matches
Mail list logo
