>From that discussion (
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2013/05/msg00012.html ),
Michael Ossipoff mentions a similar solution for the "beat default"
criterium problem as my suggestion, except for a different voting system:
> Do a rank-balloting among all of the options, with D as one of the
o
Hi,
Thue Janus Kristensen:
> I don't know enough about Michael Ossipoff's suggested complete
> change of voting system to have an opinion about that.
>
It's not a "complete change". The basic Condorcet method is unchanged.
We merely change (fix?) what we do when there's no single winner.
I have
Thue Janus Kristensen writes:
> So in the init system vote example with my rule modification, D, U and
> FD would end up in the Schwartz set, Bdale would choose D, and the final
> result would then be FD, because D doesn't beat FD. So this rule change
> means that U cannot win unfairly due to str
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
> Op donderdag 13 februari 2014 14:13:40 schreef Alexander Wirt:
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > If indeed listmasters do object (which I don't think will be the case,
> > > but of course I can't read their minds), then obvious
4 matches
Mail list logo
